Articles of the Week – 6/13-6/19

Sunday June 14:

Negotiating With Jihadists in the Sahel and Nigeria – Jacob Zenn, Lawfare: https://bit.ly/2Ne6OJy

Tuesday June 16:

ISIS on the Iraqi-Syrian Border: Thriving Smuggling Networks – Husham Al-Hashimi, Center for Global Policy: https://bit.ly/2NekJ2i

Wednesday June 17:

Rethinking the weak state paradigm in light of the war on terror: Evidence from the Islamic Republic of Mauritania – Zekeria Ould Ahmed Salem, POMEPS: https://bit.ly/30Xr4Hl

Why Are There Few Islamist Parties South of the Sahara? – Alexander Thurston, POMEPS: https://bit.ly/2AHoWcc

How Do Leadership Decapitation and Targeting Error Affect Suicide Bombings? The Case of Al-Shabaab – Mohammed Ibrahim Shire, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism: https://bit.ly/2UUdVuT

Staying Engaged in Terrorism: Narrative Accounts of Sustaining Participation in Violent Extremism – Neil Ferguson and James W. McAuley, Frontiers in Psychology: https://bit.ly/2YBPkNO

Thursday June 18:

Logistical Details and (Competing?) Accounts of the Droukdel Strike – Alex Thurston, Sahel Blog: https://bit.ly/311KJG3

They Always Come Back: A Look at the Ben Khemais Network in Milan – Hindsight Is 20/20: https://bit.ly/37GXA1E

Friday June 19:

Fake It till You Make It? Representation of Special Operations Forces Capabilities in Jihadist Propaganda Videos – Daniel Koehler, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism: https://bit.ly/2A5KKxE

“We Will Conquer Your Rome”: Italy and the Vatican in the Islamic State’s Propaganda – Francesco Marone and Marco Olimpio, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism: https://bit.ly/2VlUkE4

“Sorry, We’re Closed”: Applying Business Models to Failed Terrorist Organizations – Keith W. Ludwick, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism: https://bit.ly/2B3Kb8f

Spreading Hate on TikTok – Gabriel Weimann and Natalie Masri, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism: https://bit.ly/3eCnC97

Articles of the Week – 4/11-4/17

Monday April 13:

Towards the “olive trees of Rome”: exploitation of propaganda devices in the Islamic State’s flagship magazine “Rumiyah” – Miron Lakomy, Small Wars & Insurgencies: https://bit.ly/2VfO4hm

Liberated, not free: Yazidi women after Islamic State captivity – Gina Vale, Small Wars & Insurgencies: https://bit.ly/34HR8pR

Researching armed conflict, Boko Haram and other violent non-state actors: problems with web sources – M. J. Fox, Small Wars & Insurgencies: https://bit.ly/3cn9Oxu

War in Syria: the translocal dimension of fighter mobilization – Esther Meininghaus and Carina Schlüsing, Small Wars & Insurgencies: https://bit.ly/2ylThva

Rebel fragmentation in Syria’s civil war – Olivier J. Walther and Patrick Steen Pedersen, Small Wars & Insurgencies: https://bit.ly/2VioMiY

The Political Power of Proxies: Why Nonstate Actors Use Local Surrogates – Assaf Moghadam and Michel Wyss, International Security: https://bit.ly/2RN5q31

Career Foreign Fighters: Expertise Transmission Across Insurgencies – Chelsea Daymon, Jeanine de Roy van Zuijdewijn, and David Malet: https://bit.ly/2VARmuB

Tuesday April 14:

Islamic State Propaganda in India – Kabir Taneja, GNET: https://bit.ly/2xvGFBM

Weapon of the Strong? Government Support for Religion and Majoritarian Terrorism – Peter S. Henne, Nilay Saiya, and Ashlyn W. Hand, Journal of Conflict Resolution: https://bit.ly/2ys7cQc

The Death of a Northern Malian Shaykh, and a Few of My Analytical Blindspots – Alex Thurston, Sahel Blog: https://bit.ly/2RMUdj5

Democratic breakdown and terrorism – Joshua Tschantret, Conflict Management and Peace Science: https://bit.ly/2VHdofc

Wednesday April 15:

Coronavirus and Official Islamic State Output: An Analysis – Aymenn Al-Tamimi, GNET: https://bit.ly/3cnbOpu

Landmines and Improvised Explosive Devices: The Lingering Terror of the Islamic State – Aaron Anfinson and Nadia Al-Dayel, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism: https://bit.ly/3bigHjR

Thursday April 16:

From “Western education is forbidden” to the world’s deadliest terrorist group: Education and Boko Haram in Nigeria – Madiha Afzal, Brookings Institution: https://brook.gs/34RLilS

Preventing Extremism with Extremists: A Double-Edged Sword? An Analysis of the Impact of Using Former Extremists in Danish Schools – David Parker and Lasse Lindekilde, Education Sciences: https://bit.ly/3auYz4N

New release from al-Muhājirah al-Gharbīyah: “Important Advice For the Female Captives From the Free Women of This Nation”

Arabic: 

الحمدُ لله وكفَى، والصَّلاةُ والسّلامُ على النبيِّ المُصطَفَى، وعلى آلِهِ وصحبِه ومن لأثرِهم اقتَفى،

أمّا بعدُ؛

فمِمّا لا يخفَى علَى أُمّتِنا الثّكلَى ما حلَّ بإمائِها الحرائِر منْ عظيمِ بلاءٍ، تتفطّرُ له قلوبُ الغيَارَى ولا نقولُ سوى اللهم إنا نعوذ بكَ من جَهدِ البلاء، ودركِ الشقا، وسوءِ القضاء، وشماتةِ الأعداءِ.

ومن المعلومِ أن ما حلّ بنساءِ أمتنا في مخيّمات الذلّ، لهو من النوازلِ التي يحارُ فيها اللبيب، فأن تؤسرُ عوائلُ بأكملها جلها من النساء والأطفال وبهذه الأعداد المهولة، من الحادثات التي قل أن شهدها تاريخُ البشريّة؛ {وَمَا نَقَمُوا مِنْهُمْ إِلَّا أَن يُؤْمِنُوا بِاللَّهِ الْعَزِيزِ الْحَمِيدِ}.

وقد بلغتنا بعضُ التصرّفاتِ التي صدرت وتصدرُ من بعضِ أخواتِنا الأسيرات – أصلحهنّ الله – والتي تفتقد إلى الكثيرِ من الحكمةِ والسّياسةِ، وهي تصرّفات وأفعال وإن كانت فرديّة إلّا أنها تعود غالبًا بالضررِ على جميعِ الأسيرات، كما ولا ننكرُ أن بعضَ تلك التصرّفات ناجمة عن حرقةِ الأختِ على دينها وسعيها للذبّ عن عقيدتها، فرأينا أن نستعينَ بالله تعالى ونكتبُ هذه الكليمات، نُصحًا للأخواتِ وإرشادًا للأسيرات والله من وراءِ القصد.

?أوّلًا؛ فلتعلم الأخت الموحّدة المسلمة أنّ الطريقَ إلى اللهِ طريقٌ شائكٌ مليءٌ بالعثراتِ والعقبات، وأنّ الابتلاءَ في ذات الله عزّ وجلّ ليس حكرًا على الرجلِ دون المرأةِ، فالمرأةُ أيضا تُبتلى فتُقتلُ وتؤسرُ؛ وقد تُسبَى وتُبترُ، وما إلى ذلك من المكارهِ التي يُكابدها المسلمُ الموحّد في سبيل ربه وإعلاءً لكلمتِه في الأرضِ.

ففي سبيل الحنيفيّة أسِرت سارة زوج خليل الله إبراهيم عليه السّلام، وراودها طاغوت مصر على نفسها ونجّاها الله منه، وفي سبيل الحنيفيّة عُذبت آسيا زوج فرعون، وفي سبيل الحنيفيّة قُتلت سميّة بنت خيّاط، وفي سبيل الحنيفيّة جاعت خديجة أم المؤمنين وبناتها بنات النبيّ – صلّى الله عليه وسلم – حتى كان أهل مكّة يسمعون أصوات النساء والأطفال المحاصرين في شعب أبي طالب وهم يتضوّرون جوعا!

فلا تظنّي أختي الأسيرة – ثبّتكِ الله – أن ما قد أصابكِ أمرٌ جديدٌ مُحدث، بل هو طريق الأولين ومن تبعهم بإحسانٍ إلى يوم الدّين؛ “وكذلك الرسل تبتلى ثم تكون لها العاقبة”.

?ثانيًا؛ اعلمي – سلّمكِ الله – أنّكِ وأنتِ أسيرة مُستضعفةٌ، والاستضعافُ من الضّعفِ، والضّعف خلافُ القوّةِ.

ومن لطفِ الله بعبيده أن جعل من شريعته شريعةً سمحةً فيها مراعاةٌ لأحوالِ العبادِ عند الاضطرارِ والضّرورةِ، بل قد تتغيّرُ الأحكامُ بناءً على وضعِ العبدِ أو الجماعةِ.

قالَ اللهُ تعالى: {فَمَنِ اضْطُرَّ غَيْرَ بَاغٍ وَلَا عَادٍ فَلَا إِثْمَ عَلَيْهِ إِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ} [البقرة:173].

وقال أيضًا:{فَمَنِ اضْطُرَّ فِي مَخْمَصَةٍ غَيْرَ مُتَجَانِفٍ لِإِثْمٍ فَإِنَّ اللَّهَ غَفُورٌ رَحِيمٌ}[المائدة:3].

ومن السُنّةِ النبويّةِ المُطهرةِ فلنَا في قصّةِ عمّارِ بنِ ياسر – رضي الله عنه – عبرٌ وفوائدُ، إذ لاقَى عمّار في سبيلِ الله ما لاقى من مُشركي قريش وأكرهوه على قولِ كلمةِ الكفرِ، فنزلَ قولُ الله تعالى:

{إِنَّمَا يَفْتَرِي الْكَذِبَ الَّذِينَ لَا يُؤْمِنُونَ بِآيَاتِ اللَّهِ ۖ وَأُولَٰئِكَ هُمُ الْكَاذِبُونَ ۝ مَن كَفَرَ بِاللَّهِ مِن بَعْدِ إِيمَانِهِ إِلَّا مَنْ أُكْرِهَ وَقَلْبُهُ مُطْمَئِنٌّ بِالْإِيمَانِ وَلَٰكِن مَّن شَرَحَ بِالْكُفْرِ صَدْرًا فَعَلَيْهِمْ غَضَبٌ مِّنَ اللَّهِ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ} [النحل: 105 106].

قال ابنُ عباس – رضي الله عنهما – : (أخذه المشركون وأخذوا أباه وأمه سميَّة وصهيبًا وبلالًا وخبَّابًا وسالمًا فعذبوهم، وربطت سمية بين بعيرين ووُجِئ قُبُلها بحربة، وقيل لها إنك أسلمت من أجل الرجال، فقُتلت وقُتل زوجُها ياسر، وهما أول قتيلين في الاسلام.

وأما عمار فأعطاهم ما أرادوا بلسانه مكرهًا، فشكا ذلك إلى رسولِ الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم، فقال له رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم: (كيف تجد قلبك؟) قال: مطمئن بالايمان، فقال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم: (فإن عادوا فعد) [رواه الحاكمُ وقال على شرط الشيخين].

وعن ابنِ عبّاسٍ – رضي الله عنهما – يرفعه قال: قال – صلى الله عليه وسلم – : (إنَّ الله وضع عن أمتي الخطأ والنسيان وما استكرهوا عليه) [رواه ابن ماجه وابن حبان يرفعه وكذا الحاكم وقال صحيح على شرط الشيخين].

وبناءً على ما تقدّم يتبيّنُ للأختِ الأسيرةِ أنّها مُستضعفة وتأخذُ حكمَ المضطرِّ في أمورٍ كثيرة، والضرورةُ تُقدّرُ بقدرها، ومن المؤكّد أن من تُعذَّب في السجونِ ويُنتهكُ عرضها ويذيقُها أعداءُ اللهِ صنوفًا شتّى من صنوفِ التعذيبِ والتّنكيلِ، ليست كمن تجلِسُ في خيمةٍ لا تُعذّبُ ولا تُستكرهُ على شيْءٍ وإنّما هي مسلوبةُ الحريّة لا أكثر!

?ثالثًا؛ وإذا ما استوعبتِ أختنا أنّكِ مُستضعفة، ينبغي لكِ حينها أن تعلمي أنّ أهل العلمِ قد قرّروا قاعدةً فِقهيّةً عظيمةً ألا وهيَ: “درء المفَاسِدِ مقدّمٌ على جلبِ المَصالحِ”

ومعناهَا؛ أنّه إذا تعارَضَت مفسدةٌ ومصلحةٌ يُقدَّم رفعُ المفسدةِ على جلبِ المصلحةِ؛ لأنّ اهتِمامَ الشّرعِ بالمنهيَّات أشدُّ من اهتمامِه بالمأموراتِ، وخيرُ مثالٍ على تجلّي هذه القاعدة في أيّامِنا هذه ما يحدثُ بينَ أخواتِنا الأسيرات، فتأتي إحداهنّ أو بعضهنّ بفعلٍ ظاهره المصلحة ولكن عواقبَه تكون وخيمةً على بقيّة الأسيرات واللهُ المُستعان.

بعضُ الأخواتِ – هداهنّ الله – ينادين بالجهادِ وهنّ في الأسر! أيّ جهادٍ هذا يا رعاكِ الله؟! وليست رسالة إحدى الأخوات عنّا ببعيد والتي خاطبت فيها جُنودَ الدولةِ واستنفرتهم بما معناه: (نحن جاهزات وقد حددنا السكاكين وقد اشتقنا لأصوات الرصاص والانفجارات)، والله ما هذا إلا قلّة عقلٍ، إذ كيف لعاقلةٍ أن تتفوّه بمثل هذه الأمور التي قد يتّخذها السجّان حُجّةً للنّيل من الأسيراتِ وتنغيصِ عيشهنّ المنغّصِ أصلًا؟!

وتستغلها الصحافة للتحريض على الأسيرات؛ مما يُطلق السجانين بالتنكيل بالأسيرات دون رقيب أو عنيب.

حسنًا؛ ماذا جنيتنّ من الاعتداء على العساكر أوقتلِ عنصر أو اثنين منهم؟

لا شيء سوى مزيدًا من التضييق على المهاجراتِ ومنعهنّ من السوق والتداوي وجميع مؤهلات الحياة، حتّى الماء والثلج الذي كان يدخل إليهم منعوه عنهن في أشدّ الأيّام حرًّا!

وهذا غير تجديد التحقيق والتفتيش والإهانة والإذلال.

وهذا ما لا تُقدّره الكثير من أخواتِنا – أصلحهنّ الله – اللاتي لازلن يعشنَ على أنغام الخلافةِ والتّمكين!!

لا

Articles of the Week – 10/5-10/11

Sunday October 6:

Revolutionary Warfare? Assessing the Character of Competing Factions within the Boko Haram Insurgency – Edward Stoddard, African Security: https://bit.ly/2IJ4F6N

Monday October 7:

Teaching about terrorism, extremism and radicalisation: some implications for controversial issues pedagogy – Lee Jerome and Alex Elwick, Oxford Review of Education: https://bit.ly/2VyBnwC

Decoding Islamic State’s allegiance videos – Mina al-Lami, BBC Monitoring: https://bit.ly/2nGTm7Q

Wednesday October 9:

Militarized Law Enforcement Forces, State Capacity and Terrorism – Mustafa Kirisci, Terrorism and Political Violence: https://bit.ly/2MvBoh2

Thursday October 10:

Newly Released ISIS Files: Learning from the Islamic State’s Long-Version Personnel Form – Daniel Milton, Julia Lodoen, Ryan O’Farrell, and Seth Loertscher, CTC Sentinel: https://bit.ly/2M5a1Lt

Operation Marksburg: Frontline Field Investigation and the Prosecution of Terrorism – Damien Spleeters, CTC Sentinel: https://bit.ly/2Mag55L

Hezbollah’s “Virtual Entrepreneurs:” How Hezbollah is Using the Internet to Incite Violence in Israel – Michael Shkolnik and Alexander Corbeil, CTC Sentinel: https://bit.ly/33ocJBQ

What Is Iran Up To in Deir al-Zour? – Oula A. Alrifai, Washington Institute for Near East Policy: https://bit.ly/33sRYFb

Providing Context: Commentary on the Debate Over the Critique of Salafi-Jihadism from a Mainstream Sunni Perspective – Nadia Oweidat, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism: https://bit.ly/2ox2nAA

Protestors, terrorists or something else? How to think about dissident groups – Joseph K Young and Steve Shellman, Conflict Management and Peace Science: https://bit.ly/2M7V0c7

Friday October 11: 

Misogyny and Violent Extremism: Implications for Preventing Violent Extremism – Melissa Johnston and Jacqui True, Monash Gender, Peace & Security Centre: https://bit.ly/2MwKObZ

What Do Closed Source Data Tell Us About Lone Actor Terrorist Behavior? A Research Note – Paul Gill, Emily Corner, Amy McKee, Paul Hitchen, and Paul Betley, Terrorism and Political Violence: https://bit.ly/31sReOA

Articles of the Week – 3/30-4/5

Monday April 1: 

Livestreaming terror is abhorrent – but is more rushed legislation the answer? – Robert Merkel, The Conversation: https://bit.ly/2K6g7fB

Economic Causes of Female Suicide Terrorism: Perceived Versus Actual – Seung-Whan Choi, Journal of Global Security Studies: https://bit.ly/2nfZ8Nl

Tuesday April 2:

Counter-terrorism and the Internet – Brian Fishman, Texas National Security Review: https://bit.ly/2WQ7NCp

Wednesday April 3:

Strategic Communications of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt – Zhaohui Yu and Yaohong Liu, Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies: https://bit.ly/2YRtofG

Paris and Nice terrorist attacks: Exploring Twitter and web archives – Valérie Schafer, Gérôme Truc, Romain Badouard, Lucien Castex, and Francesca Musiani, Media, War & Conflict:

Making al-Qa’ida legible: Counter-terrorism and the reproduction of terrorism – Sarah G. Phillips, European Journal of International Relations:

Thursday April 4:

The front page as a time freezer: An analysis of the international newspaper coverage after the Charlie Hebdo attacks – Katharina Niemeyer, Media, War & Conflict:

Moderate Islam in the Maghreb: How US foreign policy shapes Islamist contention – Vish Sakthivel, Brookings Institution: https://brook.gs/2UfVo90

Eye On Jihadis in Libya Weekly Update: December 11

IS in Action

On 8 December, IS executed six of the ten men they abducted from the town of Fuqaha on 28 October after their demands to release their comrades was rejected by the Libyan National Army (LNA).

On 3 December, IS released a eulogy for Abu Abdallah al-Ansar in its “Caravan for Martyrs”. Al-Ansar was a member of ISIS ‘s branch in eastern Libya, Wilayat Barqah.

Other Jihadi Actors

On 6 December, Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) released a statement denying any links to those killed in the US Africa Command (AFRICOM) air strikes on 29 November near al-Uwaynat.

On 29 November, AFRICOM, in coordination with the Government of National Accord (GNA), conducted an airstrike killing eleven AQIM members and destroying three vehicles near al-Uwaynat, close to the Algerian border, in southern Libya.

A weekly update of IS’s actions, the Western response, and developments pertaining to Libya’s other militias is available by subscribing here. To read about Western countries’ responses to IS in Libya this week, click here, and to read about the developments within the anti-IS Coalition of Libyan militias, click here. To read all four sections of this week’s Eye on IS in Libya report, click here.

Eye-on-Isis-Logo-001

Weekly Eye on ISIS in Libya Update – April 25, 2017

ISIS in Action and Other Jihadi Actors

On 23 April, Abdullah Dabbashi, a Libyan ISIS leader was reportedly killed in Sabratha while in Benghazi, the LNA claimed that ISIS fighter Mohammed al-Moghrabi had not been executed as thought. A video which purportedly showed the execution of Randa was released on 24 February by the LNA’s Tariq Ibn Ziyad Brigade. The LNA claims it staged his widely condemned execution video as part of an intelligence operation to track and arrest ISIS collaborators in Benghazi. The LNA claims that 54 people have already been detained as a result of Randa’s confessions, reportedly including some LNA fighters who were informing ISIS of the LNA’s movements, and supplying weapons and ammunition to the jihadists.

The Libyan National Army (LNA) has started to build-up its forces in preparation to launch a ‘final’ assault against the jihadists, beginning with intensive airstrikes against their positions every day last week. On 20 April, jihadists in Sabri and Souq al-Hout blew up a bridge providing access to the area in attempt to reinforce their positions against an LNA assault. The first LNA advance into Sabri was made on 21 April, where LNA fighters briefly clashed with the jihadists. In an intelligence operation last week the LNA arrested Hamza Mustafa al-Shelwi, one of the leaders of the Derna Mujahedeen Shura Council (DMSC), in addition to Abdussalam Layas, who is reported to be a former ISIS member.


A weekly update of ISIS’s actions, the Western response, and developments pertaining to Libya’s other militias is available by subscribing here.  To read about Western countries’ responses to ISIS in Libya this week, click here. To read the Eye on ISIS in Libya Team’s blog post about the actions of other jihadi actors, click here. And to read their explanation of the developments within the anti-ISIS Coalition of Libyan militias, click here.
To read all four sections of this week’s Eye on ISIS in Libya report, click here. To subscribe to receive this report weekly into your inbox, sign up on the subscribe page.
Eye-on-Isis-Logo-001

GUEST POST: The Conquest of Constantinople: The Islamic State Targets a Turkish Audience

NOTE: As with all guest posts, the opinions expressed below are those of the guest author and they do not necessarily represent the views of this blogs administrator and does not at all represent his employer at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
Jihadology.net aims to not only provide primary sources for researchers and occasional analysis of them, but also to allow other young and upcoming students as well as established academics or policy wonks to contribute original analysis on issues related to jihadism. If you would like to contribute a piece, please email your idea/post to azelin [at] jihadology [dot] net.
Click here to see an archive of all guest posts.

The Conquest of Constantinople: The Islamic State Targets a Turkish Audience
By North Caucasus Caucus
“We earnestly desire from our exalted god that He grant us the good news of the conquest of Istanbul and other places, and in that vein we patiently continue.” – Konstantiniyye, June 2015, pp.6
Introduction
The Conquest of Constantinople
On 01 June 2015, official Islamic State (IS) media outlet al-Hayat Media released the first issue of a new Turkish language magazine entitled, Konstantiniyye (the transliteration of the Ottoman spelling of Constantinople). The lay out and design of the 46-page magazine are familiar to those who have read some of al-Hayat’s other publications such as Dabiq and Istok, a similar specifically Russian-language magazine just released several weeks prior to Konstantiniyye. While all the previous issues of IS’s magazine, Dabiq, had been translated into Turkish, this is the first official publication from al-Hayat directed at a Turkish audience and could be an indication of IS leadership no longer caring as much about provoking the Turkish government.
Content and Themes Directed at a Turkish Audience
The first issue of Konstantiniyye was entitled, “The Conquest of Constantinople.” In the introduction of the magazine, al-Hayat lays out its goals and bemoans that “the people of Turkey, especially Muslims, have been deprived of much of the multitude of news, writings, and videos coming out of the Islamic State each day.” To rectify this, al-Hayat states that they established a dedicated Turkey desk, which will provide official translations of all al-Hayat publications as well as publish Konstantiniyye monthly. Konstantiniyye specifically for a Turkish audience and focusing on “topics of interest to Muslims in Turkey about the Islamic State.” The writers go on to say, “We have tried not to overwhelm the reader by taking care to keep our writings short.” The release of the magazine appears to have been timed to coincide with two events in Turkey – the annual celebration of the conquest of Constantinople and the Turkish national elections.
Conquest of Istanbul
The centerpiece of the magazine is an article entitled, “The Conquest of Constantinople.” The magazine was released two days after Turkey’s annual celebration of “Fetih Gunu,” the day commemorating the fall of Constantinople to the Ottomans in 1453. The commemoration of this event has grown considerably over the last decade and become a much more prominent event in Turkish popular consciousness. The impressive panorama museum, constructed in 2006, remains a very popular tourist attraction. (I visited myself in 2014 and had to wait in line for more than 45 minutes to enter). A film about the conquest, Fetih 1453 was released in February 2012 and was the most expensive and highest grossing movie in Turkish history. Clips from Fetih 1453 were used in the al-Hayat Balkans-focused release, “Honor in Jihad.”
The article seeks to tie the conquest of Constantinople and modern day Istanbul into IS’s broader narrative about the pre-destined nature of Caliphate and the final apocalyptic battles at al-Amaq and Dabiq. Based primarily on the hadiths of Abu Hurairah, the author writes, “Allah’s messenger [Muhammed]…told us the good news that Constantinople would also be conquered. Constantinople was conquered before, but the conquest referred to in this good news has not yet occurred.” However, the conquest does not refer to taking the city by force. The author writes,  “As can be understood from these hadiths, close to the Last Hour, the city that was formerly known as Constantinople and now is known as Istanbul will be conquered with the call of takbir and without weapons or blood.” The discussion of the conquest of Istanbul is likely in line with previous claims that IS will conquer Rome. This is not an actual goal, but more to energize a potential Turkish audience.
Following “The Conquest of Constantinople,” the magazine features a poem about Istanbul (a full translation of the poem can be found at the end of this article). The popularity of poetry among jihadis has been well chronicled among many nationalities of foreign fighters (Thomas Hegghammer has written on this topic extensively, as has The New Yorker). This mirrors the increased volume of original IS-focused nasheeds regularly released throughout the last few months.
Elections and Democracy
The Conquest of Constantinople2
There ar e two sections on democracy, one entitled, “Democracy was Ignited ” and the other “The Qur’an is for the Dead and Democracy is for the Living.” Both articles lay out standard Salafi arguments about the incompatibility of being a Muslim and participating in democratic systems, as well as how the democratic systems will ultimately fall just like communism and socialism. As a potential indicator of writers knowing their audience, the first article included a meme popular on more religiously conservative Turkish Facebook pages, featuring US soldiers raiding a house in Iraq with the caption, “Open the door, Democracy is coming!” The title of the second article presents the idea that some Muslims have been deceived into believing that the Qur’an does not apply to them in their everyday life, therefore there is a need for democracy.
While unlikely coordinated, a Turkish Salafi group headed by Halis Bayancuk (Ebu Hanzala), similarly launched an anti-voting campaign. Though often associated with IS in both the Turkish and Western media, Bayancuk publicly stated in May 2015 that he has not pledged allegiance to IS emir Baghdadi, but some IS members call him their brother and he calls some IS members his brothers in religion. Using the slogan, “Don’t vote, honor your creator,” Bayancuk’s websites, Tevhidgundem, Tevhiddersleri, and Tevhiddergisi, laid out the organization’s strategy and goals. Laying out both real world and virtual tactics, goals included distributing hundreds of thousands of brochures and hanging a similar number of billets in 30 major cities around the country as well as sending five million e-mails and hashtag bombing (having supporters all tweeting at 9pm local time in order to get the campaign’s hashtags trending). On 04 June, #OyKullanmaYaratıcınaŞirkKoşma (Don’t vote, don’t undermine your creator) and #OyKullanmaRabbineSirkKosma (Don’t vote, don’t undermine your lord) did briefly trend in Turkey. Under the hashtag, supporters posted photos of themselves posting billets and using graffiti stencils to deface political advertisements throughout the country.
Considering the enviable over 85% turnout for the election, the campaign likely had a negligible effect on the overall outcome of the election. However, it shows a growing coordination and support base for Salafi groups. A similar, but much smaller campaign was launched during the last national election in 2011. One major difference was the attempt to get grass roots support – providing instructions on how people could personally get involved as well as PDFs of the brochures and stickers so supporters could have them produced in one of Turkey’s ubiquitous print shops.
Other Turkey Focused Content and Other Standard IS Propaganda
The Conquest of Constantinople3
The final two articles, calibrated to resonate specifically with a Turkish audience, are a dietary fatwa and an article about Palestinians in the Yarmouk camp. The fatwa focuses on how people living in the Islamic State should not eat meat brought in from Turkey (such as pre-packaged meat sold in grocery stores). The primary reason against eating this meat, according to the fatwa, is the animals are not slaughtered in accordance with proper rules and those handling the meat are not actually Muslims. Stories about processed meat in Turkey not being halal have existed for years (though the authors claim they have insider information on the topic). Additionally Palestinian issues have had great resonance among a large portion of the Turkish population, not just Salafis or the very religiously conservative.
The remainder of the magazine is standard IS media material – a translation of an address by IS spokesman Ebu Muhammed al Adnani entitled, “The Killers and Those who are Killed (originally released in March 2015), justification for the destruction of Iraqi antiquities, and a profile of Boko Haram and its pledge of allegiance to IS. The material is generally short and punchy and with the purpose of convincing readers the necessity to immigrate to the Islamic State.
Distribution and Reach
The website, darulhilafe.com appears to have been the first to post the

New release from the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan: "Commemorating the Nineteenth Anniversary of the Historical Gathering and Selection of Amīr al-Mu'minīn on April 4th, 1996 in Kandahar: The Biography of the Leader of the Islamic Emirate Mullā Muḥmmad 'Umar"

1banner

الحمدلله وکفی  و الصلوة والسلام علی عباده الذین اصطفی امابعد

16th of Aries 1375 AH (solar) i.e. 4th April 1996 AD is a momentous day in the history of our Muslim people. Nearly two decades ago on this same faithful day, one thousand and five hundred scholars, dignitaries and Jihadi leaders of Afghanistan approved Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ as the leader of the Islamic Emirate, gave an oath of allegiance to him and conferred the title of ‘Amir-ul-Momineen’ on him i.e. leader of the pious believers.
In the official almanac of the Islamic Emirate, this day has its own significance due to that historical event which subsequently is being commemorated by the Cultural Commission of the Islamic Emirate by publishing special articles and essays on this auspicious occasion.
As the publication of an inclusive biography of the leader of the Islamic Emirate was the urgent demand of our numerous colleagues especially the writers and researchers, the Cultural Commission of the Islamic Emirate decided to commemorate that historical occasion by publishing a comprehensive biography of His Excellency, the Amir-ul-Momineen, Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ (may Allah safeguard him).
For the prevention of false propaganda by a number of spurious writers, analysts and some biased circles and to depict a clear picture to the writers and ordinary people, we draw the life-sketch of His Excellency, the Amir-ul-Momineen, in the following lines.

  • ØHis Birth and early growth:

Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’, son of Moulavi Ghulam Nabi, grandson of Moulavi Mohammad Rasool and the great grandson of Moulavi Baaz Mohammad was born in 1339 AH (solar) i.e. 1960 AD in a religious and learned family of Chah-i-Himmat village of Khakrez district in Kandahar province of Afghanistan. His father, Moulavi Ghulam Nabi (late) was also born in Khakrez district and had received his early education in the traditional religious institutions and circles of this area. He was a well-known and respected erudite and social figure among the masses due to his indefatigable efforts in educating and guiding the people to the right path of Islam.
Two years after the birth of Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’, his father migrated from Khakrez district to Noday village of Dand district of this same province and remained there till his last in spreading religious education among the local people. He died in 1344 AH (solar) i.e. 1965 AD in that area and was laid to rest in the old famous graveyard of Taliban in Kandahar city.
After the death of his father, Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ shifted at the age of five along with his family members from Dand district of Kandahar province to Deh-Rawud district of Uruzgan province where he started his early life under the supervision of his uncles Moulavi Mohammad Anwar and Moulavi Mohammad Jumma.

  • ØHis Early education:

At the age of eight, Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ joined the primary madrassa of Shar-i-Kohna area in Deh-Rawud district to get religious education. This madrassa was supervised by his uncle, Moulavi Mohammad Jumma and Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ also started his early education from him.
Both of his uncles, particularly Moulavi Mohammad Anwar, played a key role in his religious teaching and training.
Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ successfully completed his primary and middle level education from this madrassa. While eighteen, he started acquiring the traditional higher religious studies in the region but could not complete them due to the malicious communist coup d’état in 1978 AD in Afghanistan.

  • ØHis Family:

Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ belongs to the ‘Tomzi’ clan of ‘Hotak’ tribe which comprises a large part of Pashtuns which has delivered eminent Islamic statesmen, national and Jihadi heroes like the legendary Islamic figure of ‘Haji Mirwais Khan Hotak’.
Great Ghazi Haji Mirwais Khan Hotak (may Allah bless him), who is remembered with the venerated title of ‘Mirwais Nika’ (i.e. Mirwais, the grandfather) by Afghans, liberated Afghanistan from the tyranny of ‘Safavid’ dynasty in 1712 AD and laid down the foundation of a sovereign and independent Islamic state for Afghans.
Professionally, the family of Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ comprises of scholars and teachers of religious studies. They devoted all their lives to serving the sacred religion of Allah Almighty, to promoting religious knowledge and to educating the Muslim masses ideologically. Therefore they were deeply admired in their area and spiritually, they were considered the most dignified and social figures of the society.
The birth of Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ in such a spiritual and learned family and his upbringing under the direct patronage of his well-educated and ideological patrons deeply cultivated in him the ability to grow as a sincere Mujahid, a compassionate and vigilant Islamic and national figure who could emancipate the Afghan society from tyranny, corruption and injustice and preserve our beloved homeland (Afghanistan) from the imminent danger of disintegration.
His brothers, uncles and all other family members are ‘Mujahidin’ and four of his family members have already sacrificed their lives as martyrs in the path of Allah Almighty. Mullah Mohammad Hanafia, the uncle of Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ was the first one who was martyred on 7th October 2001, the starting date of the brutal bombardment of American invaders.

  • ØHis Jihadi struggles:

Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ was in his early twenties when the communists usurped control of Afghanistan through a bloody military coup d’état. It was a time when it became nearly impossible for Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ like all other heedful students to continue their studies as the starting encounter of atheist communists was against the scholars, Taliban, students and other Muslim intellectuals throughout the country. At that time, Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ decided to abandon his higher studies unfinished. He left madrassa and turned towards Jihadi front to discharge his religious obligation.
He started his Jihadi struggle under a well-known Jihadi organization of ‘Harkat-i-Inqilaab-i-Islami’ (Islamic Revolutionary Movement) in Deh-Rawud district of Uruzgan province. After spending a while in this district, he earned a reputation for being a valiant Jihadi figure who played an active role in several military operations against the communists in various parts of that district. Due to his Jihadi prominence and a successful role in various Jihadi operations, he used to get the unanimous consent of all the Mujahidin of different parts and groups to be their commander in Deh-Rawud district for leading large-scale offensives against the enemy and he executed exceptionally successful operations in which he was wounded several times. He participated in many confrontations for more than three years along with his local Mujahidin against the invading Russians and their internal communist puppets.
The companions and commanders of his Jihadi front say that Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’, in-spite of being young, was efficient enough to discharge any responsibility or task as he was bestowed with strong physical composition and potency.
Later in 1983 AD, he went to ‘Maiwand’ district of ‘Kandahar’ province along with his Jihadi colleagues for the better co-ordination of Jihadi activities and continued his armed struggle against the Russian invaders and their internal stooges under the leadership of famous Jihadi commander ‘Faizullah Akhunzada’ who belonged to ‘Harkat-i-Inqilab-i-Islami’ (The Islamic Revolutionary Movement), one of the seven well-known Jihadi organizations of that time. Due to his successful role as a local Jihadi commander in numerous Jihadi operations and his efficiency and distinction in military tactics, he drew the attention of the then Jihadi organizations and eventually, he was permanently given the responsibility of a Jihadi front through ‘The Islamic Revolutionary Movement’ headed by (late) Moulavi Mohammad Nabi Mohammadi.
From 1983 to 1991, Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ executed very successful operations in the suburbs of ‘Maiwand’, ‘Zhari’, ‘Panjwai’ and ‘Dand’ districts of Kandahar province which were vital Jihadi centers and Mujahidin used to be involved in fighting the enemy on a daily basis. Similarly he personally and directly participated in several victorious operations against the Russian invaders on the main ‘Kabul-Kandahar’ high way in the suburbs of ‘Shahr-i-Safa’ and ‘Qalat’ cities of Zabul province. His preferred weapon of choice was the ‘RPG-7’, which was simply called ‘Rocket’ among the local Mujahidin, as he was proficient and an expert in using this weapon. It is worth mentioning that ‘Maiwand’, ‘Zhari’ and ‘Panjwai’ districts of Kandahar province were areas of intense fighting during the Jihad against communism which turned the tide and brought about Russia’s defeat and withdrawal. Such a large number of tanks and other military vehicles were destroyed on the main ‘Kandahar-Herat’ highway that the enemy had erected walls made from these wreckages on both sides of the road to protect them from Mujahidin assaults.
Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ was wounded four times in confrontational Jihadi operations against the Russians and in one of these operations, he lost his right eye.
Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ was known as a prominent and distinguished Jihadi commander who played a crucial and decisive role in numerous Jihadi operations against the Russian invaders and their internal communist puppets in Kandahar and its neighboring provinces. In the following lines, we will mention some events and anecdotes by his Jihadi companions against the Russian invaders.

  1. 1.The enemy had a strong post inside Kandahar province which was known as ‘Budwan’ post. A military tank was stationed by the enemy at a strategic juncture near the post which created a great hurdle for the Mujahidin as it could target any line-of-fire easily. Mujahidin tried their best to destroy this tank but failed to succeed. Eventually Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ was called in for help from ‘Sang-i-Hisaar’ area. He hit and destroyed this tank of ‘Budwan’ post with his ‘RPG’ rocket launcher which was a tremendous success for the Mujahidin at that time.
  2. 2.During the Holy Jihad against Russians in ‘Mahalla-Jaat’ area of ‘Kandahar’ province, Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ was accompanied in a confrontation with the enemy by ‘Shaheed Mullah Ubaidulla Akhund’ who was later appointed the Defense Minister of the Islamic Emirate and the Deputy of ‘Ameer-ul-Momineen’ (i.e. the leader of the pious believers) after the American invasion. A large number of enemy tanks and other military vehicles were destroyed by them. The following day, visitors were bewildered and could not believe that the enemy was repelled. They thought that the enemy forces were still intact even though a large number of their vehicles were burnt and the remaining ones were pushed back to their previous locations.
  3. 3.A convoy of Russian military tanks was passing through ‘Sang-i-Hisaar’ area of ‘Zhari’ district on the main ‘Kandahar-Herat’ highway. Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ was accompanied by ‘Mullah Biradar Akhund’ who later became the Deputy of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, while they only had four RPG rounds. Unwavering they attacked the convoy and destroyed four military tanks with these rounds.
  4. 4.Mullah Biradar Akhund, a close friend of Mullah Mohammad Umar ‘Mujahid’ during the Holy Jihad era against the Russians, said that such a large number of Russian tanks were destroyed by him that his friends are unsure about its exact number.

In 1992, after the collapse of Najeeb’s communist regime and with the eruption of factional fighting throughout the country,

The Clear Banner: French Foreign Fighters in Iraq 2003-2008

The Clear Banner sub-blog on Jihadology.net is primarily focused on Sunni foreign fighting. It does not have to just be related to the phenomenon in Syria. It can also cover any location that contains Sunni foreign fighters. If you are interested in writing on this subject please email me at azelin [at] jihadology [dot] net.

French Foreign Fighters in Iraq 2003 – 2008
By Timothy Holman

Initial assessments by French and US intelligence from 2005, cited in press in 2008, evaluated that there was a significant risk of attacks by eventual returnees from the Iraq theatre. These assessments were drawn-up amongst early reports of hundreds of foreign fighters from Europe.i By 2008, the numbers of European foreign fighters had not reached the initially anticipated volumes and attacks had not materialized.ii In fact, French foreign fighters were now seeking to enter Afghanistan, having abandoned the idea of foreign fighting in Iraq as either too dangerous or as no longer being a ‘pristine jihad’.iii

The attention of French and other Western authorities turned to al-Qaeda core (AQC) members in the Af/Pak zone who remained active in planning and supporting attacks against the West, and later towards Yemen, where a rejuvenated al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), demonstrated deadly intent and resourcefulness in targeting the United States.iv The Iraq-era networks and their apparently diminishing threat slowly receded into the background as these AQ-affiliated entities focused their attention on attacking the West. The beginning of the conflict in Syria and the flood of European foreign fighters meant the Iraq-era networks were for the most part not a subject of study or analysis.v

The Paris and Toulouse attacks in France were perpetrated by foreign fighters with associations to jihadist networks that first came to the attention of the French authorities in the wake of the United States invasion of Iraq and a renewed surge in interest in foreign fighting. The French and Belgian authorities disrupted these networks in early 2005 (Buttes-Chaumont, Paris) and early 2007 (Artigat, Toulouse region and Brussels, Belgium). Despite the action and activities (arrests, trials and imprisonment) by the French authorities, members of the networks continued to associate, radicalize, and form new relationships, in the context of these evolving networks. In the cases of some, their intent moved from foreign fighting abroad, to attacking inside France.

The French Iraq-era Networks and Clusters

In September 2004, the French authorities opened a judicial investigation into what they termed the ‘filières irakiennes’ (Iraq networks). Six cases were brought to trial; the 19th network/ Buttes-Chaumont group, the Montpellier cluster, the Nice cluster, the Ansar al-Fath group, the Tours cluster, and the Artigat network.vi The 19th network sent the most individuals into Iraq. The Montpellier cluster sent two persons to Syria; one travelled to Iraq, the second desisted and returned to France where he was arrested. The Nice cluster network was an investigation into connections to individuals in the Kari network in Belgium, which also resulted in a trial and convictions. The Ansar al-Fath group was formed around a former Groupe Islamique Armé (GIA) member and individuals he had met in prison. The group initially had the intention of engaging in foreign fighter activity but was redirected into domestic plotting through the instructions of a Syria-based Tunisian facilitator. The group then concentrated its energy into this activity; overseas travel was to Lebanon for training in explosives. The French authorities disrupted the group and the individuals imprisoned.vii In October 2006, three residents of Tours, France traveled to Damascus, Syria with the intention of crossing into Iraq to fight against United States (US) military forces. The three men were rapidly arrested by Syrian security forces as they sought to locate a smuggler to take them across border. They were eventually deported to France and tried.viii This cluster mostly closely resembles the types of individuals that would later participate in the Syria mobilization from France.ix

The Artigat network was a Toulouse-based entity, whose members congregated around a Syrian Afghanistan-veteran in the small town of Artigat. Others traveled to Cairo, Damascus, and in the case of one to Medina, in Saudi Arabia. The travel was for a combination of Arab-language training and to be able to live in countries perceived as better adapted to their faith.x Over-time some members became interested in foreign fighting. Attempts were made to enter Iraq using a Saudi Arabia-based facilitator, who had come into contact with the student based in Medina. The existence and activities of the group became well known to the general public following the 2012 attacks in southwest France by Mohamed Merah. Merah was friends with a core member of the group, and Merah’s brother and sister were also actively engaged in the network. The network continued to exist in some form even after the Toulouse attacks, and members associated with the network have traveled to Syria, including Merah’s sister.xi Since the network formed, participants have been involved in a combination of ‘hijra’, foreign fighting, and domestic terrorist activity.

The story of the 19th network is now well known following the Paris attacks.xii It has origins in Farid Benyettou’s contacts with individuals engaged in militant activity and el-Hakim’s travel to Syria and Iraq and relationships formed while living there. A group of comprised of friends and family members grew around Benyettou in their neighborhood in Paris. Incensed by the war in Iraq and images of Abu Ghraib, the network mobilized to send themselves to fight in Iraq. The group was eventually disrupted from 2004 onwards by a combination of arrests by the US, Syrians and French. A 2008 trial saw members sentenced with some released due to time-served while others returned to prison to see out the remainder of their sentences. In 2010, a small cluster of members through contacts made in prison sought to organize to free an imprisoned GIA bomb maker responsible for the 1995 metro bombings.xiii The planning was organized by a former Afghanistan networks facilitator, Djamel Behgal, who had been assigned to residence following the end of his prison term, while awaiting the result of court proceedings to expel him from France to Algeria. Some members of this group were tried and sentenced in 2013, while others were released due to lack of evidence. A third and final cluster formed between the remnants of the 19th network, and the Beghal cluster. This small cluster would go on to plan and execute the most lethal attacks in France since 1961.xiv

What happened to the French foreign fighters?

Thomas Hegghammer estimates that about 100 European foreign fighters travelled to Iraq.xv My preliminary research has found traces of approximately 54 names of foreign fighters from Europe, who traveled or tried to travel to Iraq from 2003 onwards. They originate from ten countries, nine in Western Europe and one in the Western Balkans. It is probable that there were more fighters, but to-date searches in press reports, judicial documents, martyrs lists, captured terrorist documentation and estimates of captured foreign fighters by the US military give a figure of 54 foreign fighters originating from Europe. This figure is a long way from the estimated 3000 Western Europeans who have traveled to Syria and more recently again to Iraq.xvi

A Preliminary Estimate of European Foreign Fighters in Iraq (2003-2008) and Syria (2011 onwards)


The Iraq numbers are calculated from known travelers to Iraq. The list includes some who were arrested in Syria while attempting to enter Iraq and others who reached Syria but returned home unable to find a facilitator. The Syria numbers come from press reporting or statements by governments compiled in late 2014. See blog post, “Black Math: Getting more from the Foreign Fighter Numbers”, October 10, 2014, https://acrossthegreenmountain.wordpress.com/2014/10/10/black-math-getting-more-from-the-foreign-fighter-numbers/. The French numbers exclude those wanting to travel and those in transit.

Despite the low absolute numbers, but similar to Syria, French foreign fighters formed the largest proportion – 39% – of the European contingent. According to my research there were 21 persons who traveled at least as far as Syria. Marc Trévidic estimates that there were 30 French foreign fighters but publicly available information currently exists for 21.xvii The French foreign fighters came in their majority from the Buttes-Chaumont network. The numbers used in the analysis that follows draw on the figure of 21, as there is some data on what happened to these fighters. The small sample size means that the observations from the analysis are tentative and subject to revision as more information becomes available.xviii

What Happened to the French Foreign Fighters in Iraq

Status

Number

Notes

Arrested in Syria

5

Two from the Artigat network and three from Tours cluster.
Dead

5

Four from 19th, and one from Montpellier
Imprisoned in Iraq

1

One from 19th (excludes second 19th member who escaped prison and returned to France, counted as a returnee)
Returnee

4

Three from 19th and one from Montpellier
Unknown

2

Individual who traveled possibly from Marseilles with Italy-based Tunisians, individual mentioned in Sinjar documents.
Unknown presumed dead

3

One from 19th, one from Nice cluster and one from Artigat network.
Unsuccessful

1

Associate of 19th who traveled later to Syria circa. 2007
Total

21

The majority of the French foreign fighters traveled in two waves to try and enter Iraq, 41% (9 fighters) in 2004 and 30% (6 fighters) in 2006. The largest number of successful entries was in 2004, when all of the foreign fighters were able to enter Iraq compared to 2006, when only one of the six travelers is reported to have successfully crossed from Syria into Iraq.

The data indicates that there were four returnees. The Montpellier grouping provided the first returnee, although, this individual’s status as returnee could be questioned, as he appears to have traveled as far as Syria and then renounced traveling further when he understood he could be tasked to carry-out a suicide bombing. The other three returnees came from the 19th network.

Three of the four returnees engaged in some form of domestic activity.