Articles of the Week – 10/16-10/22

Sunday October 17:
Top “Ten” Jihadi Forums 17 October 2010 – Aaron Weisburd, Internet Haganah: https://bit.ly/9yeXg1
Review of Contemporary Arab Thought: Cultural Critique In Comparative Perspective – Yoav Di-Capua, Current Intelligence: https://bit.ly/cRiG6i
Monday October 18:
Radicalisation on British University Campuses: a case study – Quilliam Foundation: https://bit.ly/bMFxJz
Saudi Disinformation? – Gregory D. Johnsen, Waq al-Waq: https://bit.ly/c6OAmC
Umarov Again Lambastes Dissident Field Commanders – Liz Full, The Caucasus Report: https://bit.ly/c257kq
Tuesday October 19:
Writings of Saeed Obeid al-Jamhi: A Fresh Yemeni Attack on al-Qaida Ideology – Youssef Aboul-Enein, Small Wars Journal: https://bit.ly/9vIsit
Prominent European Islamic Terrorist Renounces Extremism – Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, The Atlantic: https://bit.ly/93u7ET
Why U.S. Can’t Find Osama Bin Laden – Peter Bergen, CNN: https://bit.ly/bvaNUt
Thursday October 21:
Somalia: The Ethiopian Factor – Mogadishu Man Blog: https://bit.ly/aTnsNX
Nigerian Authorities Escalate Fight with Boko Haram – Alex Thurston, Sahel Blog: https://bit.ly/ag6BJT
AQAP’s Former Foreign Fighters – Clint Watts, Selected Wisdom: https://bit.ly/d3f8xB
Somalia: The Ethiopian Factor II – Mogadishu Man Blog: https://bit.ly/aK3ynB
The New Ideologues of the North Caucasus Jihadists – Murad Batal al-Shishani, Terrorism Monitor: https://bit.ly/9TrD6S
Analysis: Anwar Awlaki’s message to Inspire readers – Thomas Joscelyn, The Long War Journal: https://bit.ly/aY9ky0
Friday October 22:
Demilitarizing Jihad – J.M. Berger, Veterans Vision: https://bit.ly/acN5I9
Intelligence is Cramping al Qaeda’s Style – Mark Stout, Spy Blog: https://bit.ly/92xWEl
Somalia: The Ethiopian Factor III – Mogadishu Man Blog: https://bit.ly/drZ4HC
Is It Islamic or Islamist?: The West’s confusion spells trouble – Hayri Abaza & Soner Cagaptay, Newsweek: https://bit.ly/93jD8J

Abū Muṣ'ab al-Sūrī and the Invasion of Afghanistan

I have been reading the abridged version of Abū Muṣ’ab al-Sūrī’s book The Global Islamic Resistance Call (Da’wat al-Muqāwamah al-Islāmīyyah al-’Alāmīyyah) edited by Jim Lacey and came across an interesting passage when discussing the history of the Tunisian jihadist movement:

They did not have much interest in the battle of the Taliban and the Muslim principality, and they were hesitant to get involved with the Taliban government or to consider it a religious legal leader in Afghanistan … They were also not convinced of the attempts bin Laden and al Qaida were making, nor of the latter’s military unidirectional penchant. Indeed, this was the case with the majority of the organizations and the Arab groups in Afghanistan. Nevertheless, despite all of these facts, when the American attacks occurred, every one of them got involved in that battle.

This reminded me of a recent tweet from Leah Farrall:

I wonder when, if ever, we’ll start talking about how we made AQ’s day, with Afghanistan, then Iraq.

I’m not sure whether Farrall is referencing al-Sūrī’s observation that the American invasion brought together a bunch of disparate nationalist-jihadist movements into al-Qā’idah’s global jihadist mold or that it led the United States into an economically bloodletting war. Either way, it raises an interesting question that has not been discussed much: what role the invasion of Afghanistan had on bringing many of the nationalist-jihadist groups — that were solely training in Afghanistan during the Ṭālibān’s rule to overthrow their own local regimes — over to al-Qā’idah’s side.
Addendum: It should be noted that I am not necessarily saying that we should not have invaded Afghanistan, rather it is just something to think about.

New statement from the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan: "Regarding The Latest Organized Enemy Propaganda"

NOTE: This message is from the Afghan Ṭālibān and unedited below.


Zul Qadah 12, 1431 A.H, Thursday, October 21, 2010
In the Name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful.
The NATO forces in Afghanistan, in collaboration with their Afghan puppets and western media outlets under the leadership of U.S have been trying by diplomatic maneuver and organized propaganda to make it appear as though Mujahideen of the Islamic Emirate were ready for negotiations and that they have made progress in this regard.
Although the Islamic Emirate has previously issued a number statements regarding this subject, in which it clearly rejects such false claims and calls it a failed last ditch effort by the enemy but the impudent enemy persistently keeps putting forward such mind boggling lies through its propaganda channels and through the bought out leaders of the so called Peace Council without presenting any kind of credible proof whatsoever.
Once again, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan wants to remind the world and its countrymen its stance on the issue. The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan refutes outright these false claims neither has it sent any delegations for talks and neither does it intend to negotiate at a time when the country is under occupation.
In this regard, we must say to Burhanuddin Rabbani and the other degraded faces not to revive old enmities by promoting these false allegations nor should they run the propaganda campaigns to please America. As Afghans, they should not aid General Petreaus’s strategy (bullets and negotiations) developed by the Pentagon because the General wants to have this strategy worked through your hands in such a wicked way that Afghanistan may permanently become a colony of America.
From our point of view, another reason for this intense fabricated propaganda by Karzai and General Petreaus is also likely to win the confidence of the people by making it seem as if Kabul administration (the crooked and corrupt regime) could bring forth a solution to the problems of Afghanistan.
The Islamic Emirate irrefutably believes that in the presence of foreign invaders, peace talks and any kinds of negotiation deals will be futile as they will not yield a positive outcome for the Momin people and nation. For this reason, the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan once again calls on the invaders to stop wasting their time on failed propaganda and military campaigns instead leave Afghanistan so it can enjoy a few years in peace and independence.
Insisting on continuing your crimes may get you noting but lose political and economical credibility in the eyes of the world which is likely to end up bringing about far more fatal casualties on your part.

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan

Anṣār al-Mujāhidīn Arabic Forum adds a section for Women


بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم تَمَّ بِحَمدِ الله تبارك وتعالى افتتاح قسم خاص بالنساءِ أسميناه
قسم المرأة المسلمة قِسمٌ خَاصٌ بالأنصاريات لا يَطَّلِعُ عَلَيهِ غَيرهنَّ
وسيكون هذا القسم خاص بالنساء لا يدخل ولا يَطَّلِع عليه غيرهنَّ ونرجو من الأنصاريات التفاعل في هذا القسم , ووضع كل ما هو جيد ونافع ومفيد للمرأة المسلمة ولنتعاون على البر والتقوى نسال الله أن يحفظ أخواتنا من كل سوء وأن ينصر بنا وبهنَّ الملة والدين امين والحمد لله رب العالمين.
إدارة
شبكة أنصار المجاهدين
اللهم اجعلنا خير أنصار لخير مجاهدين


 

New statement from Jaysh al-Ummah: "Appeal for HAMAS to free Shaykh Abū Ḥafṣ al-Maqdisī"

NOTE: The below statement is a call to HAMAS by Jaysh al-Ummah (Army of the Ummah), a Palestinian global jihadist group based in the Gaza Strip that sympathizes with the al-Qā’idah worldview, to release their Amir (leader) Shaykh Abū Ḥafṣ al-Maqdisī due to his declining health. According to Jaysh al-Ummah, al-Maqdisī called for a doctor in his cell, but his plea was unheeded.

 

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم الحمد لله عظيم الشأن قوي البرهان قديم السلطان والصلاة والسلام على سيد الأنام وخير عباد الرحمن، ثم أما بعد : مجاهدي السلفية فى العالم الاسلامي مشايخنا وعلمائنا نناشدكم بالتحرك الفوري والضغط علي حكومة حماس فى غزة للافراج الفوري عن الشيخ المجاهد ابو حفص المقدسي امير جيش الامة فى بيت المقدس وذلك بعد تردي وضعه الصحي الي حالة سيئة جدا …… حيث تصلنا الاخبار ان الشيخ يناشدهم من داخل زنزانته باستدعاء طبيب له ولا احد يجيب ندائه …. حسبي الله ونعم الوكيل ……………………

منقول عن منتديات بيت المقدس الجهادية
 

al-Fajr Media presents the fourteenth lesson within the Creating terrorism program by Abū ‘Ubaydah ‘Abdullah

NOTE: Thirteenth lesson: here. Twelfth lesson: here. Tenth lesson: here. Ninth lesson: here. Eighth lesson: here. Seventh lesson: here. Sixth lesson: here. Fifth lesson: here.

al-Fajr Media presents the fourteenth lesson within the Creating terrorism program by Abū ‘Ubaydah ‘Abdullah

New statement from the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan: "Peace Talks In Conditions Of The Presence Of Foreign Forces Are Meaningless And Futile"

NOTE: This interview is from the Afghan Ṭālibān and unedited below.


Zul Qadah 10, 1431 A.H, Tuesday, October 19, 2010
In the Name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful.
Interview with Maulavi Abdul Kabir, member of the Leadership Council of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan and the Coordinating Chief of the Eastern Provinces.
Q: Recently, the Head of the Kabul Administration, Karzai, announced establishment of a set-up under the name of peace high council, consisting of 69 persons including chiefs of former factions, other famous figures and former officials of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. What is your view about the establishment of the peace council, its importance and the effectiveness of its members and the council’s role in bringing about peace in the country?
A: Foundation of Jirgas and mutual deliberation is an accepted norm among the Afghans. It is an institution traditionally utilized for the resolution of internal disputes and issues. But the said peace council is a one-sided entity, having been established to protect their unilateral goals and interests.
The council consists of people who practically support the Americans, though they claim being Jihadic figures and leaders. But by siding with the American invaders, they have forfeited their credibility in the eyes of the Afghans which they once enjoyed during the era of the former Soviet Union’s invasion of Afghanistan. Similarly, some persons who were once officials of the Islamic Emirate, have been given membership in the peace council but they are not in the capacity to represent the Islamic Emirate. They themselves are living under the eyes and surveillance of the Americans.
Q: Your reaction to every initiative of peace is usually negative and, instead you emphasize on the use of force. Do you not think that this posturing portrays your weakness in the diplomatic filed?
A: In Afghanistan, in the current condition, only those efforts of peace and reconciliation are pragmatic which surely leads to withdrawal of the foreign invading forces from Afghanistan and pave the way for establishment of an Islamic system in the country. This objective can’t be achieved in conditions of presence of foreign forces in the country.
Q: During the reign of the Islamic Emirate, severe fighting took place in areas, north of Kabul and other northern provinces of the country. Thousands of armed men lost their lives as a result. Many of them were detained and tortured. Thus, it would have created mistrust between you and the hostility would have still been existing. What steps have you taken to resolve these problems and usher in an atmosphere of confidence instead? Do you intend to take certain measures to achieve that goal.
A: This fact is clear as the broad day light that the Islamic Emirate has never fought on tribal, ethnical and geographical basis. During the government of the Islamic Emirate, people of all ethnicities had participation in the government and movement including in northern parts of the country. Currently, the Islamic Emirate has presence both in the north, south and other parts of the country with formal organizational set-ups being in place in every province.
You pointed to Islamic Emirate’s antagonism during its reign in the north of the country; I would like to explain that the Islamic Emirate has never fought against the people in the north nor it harbors any kind of enmity on the basis of ethnicity and geographical location. Rather it has fought against that elements who were hurling hurdles in the way of noble objectives of the Islamic Emirate like establishment of country-wide peace and formation of an Islamic system in the country.
Similarly, the Islamic Emirate has fought against self-same elements in the south that were considered as stumbling blocks in the way of peace and establishment of an Islamic government. The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan regards all Afghans as being equal with no discrimination.
We call on all pious people in the north of the country and on all other countrymen to strengthen the strongholds of Jihad against the invaders further more and foil the overt and covert conspiracies and plans of the enemy.
Q: Some interesting points had been included in the message of Mullah Mohammad Omar Mujahid on the eve of the Eid, including details about characteristics of government system in the country. Among them, devolvement of responsibilities and posts on the basis of professionalism and expertise is worth mentioning. Other points spoke of creating a consultative system. Would you please highlight a little further by touching on the requirements needed to qualify a person to hold a post in the framework of the Islamic Emirate, namely would that include other people with modern education and professions rather than the students of Madrassa’s and religious scholars?
A: Even during the reign of the Islamic Emirate, the professional people were not disregarded but had had participation in the government. Only Taliban and religious scholars were appointed to some higher slots. The rest were professional officials who were serving the country. The Islamic Emirate will endeavor more than ever if it gained power with the help of the Almighty Allah, to appoint more professional cadres in the government.
As to your mentioning that would the advantage for appointment in a post be limited only to a Talib or a religious scholar, I would like to say. No. Never. The prerequisite for that is piety and capacity. Any one can have these qualitificiations to become proper candidate for work in the framework of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.
Q: Any government that may be established in Afghanistan, should have a comprehensive policy to maintain good relations with the neighboring countries and that the neighbors may not sense danger from them. This is necessary for stability of any government in Afghanistan. Does the Islamic Emirate has any practical plan in this regard and would it assure the neighboring countries that it would not resort to any action against them but rather would follow a policy of the principle of mutual respect?
A: We are Muslims. A Muslim knows the rights of a neighbor in the light of Islam. During its reign, the Islamic Emirate had tried to establish good relations with neighboring countries. No one can ever produce any evidence to show that we had created problems for the neighbors. Even in these critical conditions that we are passing through, no neighbor including Pakistan and Iran has evidence to prove that we have intervened in their internal affairs. The esteemed Amir-ul-Mominnee has touched on this topic in details in his messages. It is our official policy.
Q: Some times, we hear rumors claiming that the leadership of Taliban is engaged in peace talks with the Americans and the Kabul administration. They say, the talks were held first in a certain country, then in another given country. Moreover, media reports refer to your role that you have willingness to engage in peace negotiation. Who circulate these amours and what is their objective?
A: No doubt, the Americans have faced defeat at the military field. All their stratagems have gone awry. Now the Americans and their allies are making efforts to have some gains in the diplomatic field. Therefore, they launch spurious efforts under the name of reconciliation and peace. They are trying to produce some fabricated indications in order to give cosmetic leverage to their claims. They mention names of a few members of the leadership of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, saying, they have had contacts with them or at least, shown willingness to initiate negotiation. In fact, all these are futile propaganda of the invaders aimed at creating mistrust between the Muslims and the Mujahideen. You know the enemy have not produced any evidence despite many claims to indicate that the officials of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan were engaged in talks with them. Nor they are able to produce one. This explains that the talks have not taken place nor the officials of the Islamic Emirate are intending to engage in the talks.

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan

New statement from Ḥarakat al-Shabāb al-Mujāhidīn: "Regarding the Closure of Mobile Money Transfer (MMT) Service in Somalia"

NOTE: For more context on this statement see Khalid M. Medani’s 2001 Middle East Report journal article “Financing Terrorism or Survival?: Informal Finance and State Collapse in Somalia, and the US War on Terrorism” (HT Christopher Anzalone). If you want a copy of the article and can’t gain access to JSTOR, email me and I will send you a copy.

English:
Ḥarakat al-Shabāb al-Mujāhidīn — Statement Regarding the Closure of Mobile Money Transfer (MMT) Service in Somalia (En)
[scribd id=39676313 key=key-nny7y44a08eu8hjspwy mode=list]
Arabic:
Ḥarakat al-Shabāb al-Mujāhidīn — Statement Regarding the Closure of Mobile Money Transfer (MMT) Service in Somalia (Ar)
[scribd id=39674480 key=key-1zzcadqvx6k2xl3js3wq mode=list]