Home » Jabhah al-Nuṣrah

Category Archives: Jabhah al-Nuṣrah

New statement from Abnā’ Da’wat al-Tawḥīd wa-l-Jihād In Jordan: “Sorry To Your God”

الحمد لله معز الإسلام بنصره ومذل الشرك بقهره، والصلاة والسلام على من أعلى الله منار الإسلام بسيفه وعلى آله وصحبه ومن تبعه على نهجه من بعده إلى يوم الدين وبعد،

قال الله تعالى:” كنتم خير أمة أخرجت للناس تأمرون بالمعروف وتنهون عن المنكر” وقال تعالى “فأنجينا الذين ينهون عن السوء وأخذنا الذين ظلموا بعذاب بئيس بما كانوا يفسقون”

وقال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم “من رد عن عرض أخيه رد الله وجهه عن النار يوم القيامة” رواه الترمذي وحسنه.

فإنه مما لا يخفى على مسلم أن فريضة الجهاد في هذا الزمن هي من أوجب الواجبات وأن القائم بحقها صادقا هو في أشرف المقامات، وأن أقل واجب على كل مسلم هو موالاته ونصرته والذب عنه فكيف إذا كان هذا المجاهد هو إمام المسلمين وجنده القائمين بأمر الدين في زمن الغربة؟!

وإنه مما صار واضحا للعيان وليس يحتاج إلى برهان أن الدولة الإسلامية أعزها الله هي اليوم قلعة الإسلام وحصن التوحيد وجندها هم رأس حربة المسلمين، بل إنها سفينة النجاة للمسلمين مما ولجوه من بحار التيه منذ سقوط خلافتهم، وهي مجتمع العواصم للأمة من قواصم الفرقة والتشرذم وأنها قد أبانت عن وضوح ونقاء في المنهج والمشروع والراية والرؤية ما يوجب على كل مسلم السعي إلى الانضمام إليها وبيعة أميرها فضلا عن نصرتها، فقد تهاوت كل نظريّات المنظّرين المناوئين وبَان هزال مثاليّاتهم أمام حقائق الواقع المشرّف الذي أقامته الدولة الإسلامية، فكانت فِعالها أصدق من أقوالهم وحقائقها أمثل من تخيّلاتهم وتوهّماتهم، وأما شبهات المرجفين فقد ظهر لكل طالب للحق زيفها بل إن أكثرها لا يستحق ذكره فلم يعد لهؤلاء إلا الاجترار ولم يعد للطاعن من متعلق إلا الهوى.

ولقد كنا نظن أن المشايخ الذين قضوا شطرا من عمرهم في الدعوة إلى التوحيد ولاقوا في سبيل ذلك من العنت والكذب عليهم ما لاقوا سيكونون أسرع الناس في نصرة هذه الدولة الإسلامية، وسيكونون أبعد الناس عن ترداد نفس الأكاذيب والتهم التي لطالما لُفقت عليهم ونسبها أعداء الله لهم، ولكن الله ابتلانا بمواقف الشيخين أبي محمد المقدسي وأبي قتادة – هداهما الله إلى الحق – ليعلم من نطيع ولمن يكون الاتباع .. فلقد صار ما يصدر عنهما من البيانات والفتاوى هي البضاعة الرائجة عند أهل الأهواء وأرباب الانحراف من المرجئة والسرورية والإخوان، بل إن إعلام الطواغيت لما بحث لم يجد خيراً من كلامهما ليحارب به دولة الإسلام ويشوّه صورتها ويصدّ المسلمين عن ركب الخلافة .. فصار طعنهما في الدولة الإسلامية يتصدر نشرات الأخبار في الفضائيات العالمية وعناوين الصحف الرسمية، وغدا كلام الشيخين الأخير حبالا في يد سحرة الطواغيت بعد أن كانت كتبهم سياطا تجلد ظهور الطغاة .. ولا حول ولا قوة إلا بالله.

 فقد خرج الشيخ المقدسي في بيانه الأول وهو ما يزال في الأسر الذي زعم فيه رفع الغطاء ونزع الشرعية عن تنظيم الدولة كما أسماها!! فتأولنا له حينها أنه في الأسر ولعل الأخبار تصله من بطانة السوء على غير وجهها الصحيح وإن كان ذلك لا يبيح له أن يقول ما قال، فهو بعيد عن لغة الشرع التي لم تعط العصمة لأبي محمد ولا لغيره ليغطّي وينزع! ثم بعد خروج الشيخ وتواصل كثير من الإخوة معه ومحاولة تبيين حقيقة الواقع له – الذي لم يعد فيه مجال للظن – تفاجئ الجميع ببيانه الثاني الذي ادّعى فيه الإنصاف وما هو إلا مزيد طعن وتشويه ومغالطة للواقع، ثم خرج بيانه الثالث ليُغلق أي باب لإحسان الظن أو التواصل والذي يُظهر لقارئه أن قضية الشيخ ليست قضية دليل وشرع ومعرفة بالواقع، وإنما هو الهوى ولعله حاجة في النفس ، وقد وصل الأمر بالشيخ إلى مستويات لا تليق به ولم نكن لنرضاها له، فأين “ملة إبراهيم” و”الثلاثينية” و”التراجع للأمام” من هذه البيانات الأخيرة التي خلت من لغة التحقيق والتدقيق الشرعي وجانَبت الفقه الصحيح المسؤول في هذه المرحلة،وكانت أشبه بالمناكفات الحزبية والمهاترات العصبية وامتلأت بالسباب والطعن واللمز علاوة على المكابرة في الواقع المحسوس الذي لا ينكره موافق أو مخالف من مثل وصفه للدولة بـ”التنظيم”، ثم وصل به الحال إلى ما وصل إليه من ترويج الشائعات التي يُستحيا من ذكرها، نسأل الله العافية، وكل هذا وبطانة الفتنة تزيّن له مواقفه تلك.. وأما الشيخ أبو قتادة فيالله ما أوعر المنعرَج الذي تقحّمه بغير هدى إذ وصف مجاهدي الدولة الإسلامية بأنهم يقينا – كما زعم – كلاب أهل النار  ..

وتخرج هذه المواقف في الوقت نفسه الذي يخرج فيه أوباما ليقول إن الدولة الإسلامية هي العدو المشترك لأمريكا وروسيا والصين وإيران .. فإنا لله وإنا إليه راجعون ونسأل الله أن يآجرنا في مصيبتنا ويخلفنا خيرا منها .

وإنا لنعلم أن بيانات الشيخين أو غيرهما لن تقدر على تغطية الحقائق فلم يعد الأمر بحاجة لبيان من شيخ حتى يُعرَف الحق وأهله فقد ظهر الحق كفلق الصبح ، ونعلم أن الدولة الإسلامية قد مضت بمشروعها وتخطّت الشخوص وتجاوزت القداسات وغدت صرحا متينا بفضل الله، وقد عاينّا نصرة الله وتوفيقه لها وأمرها ماضٍ بإذن الله إلى أن يستضيء بنور هذه الخلافة جميع المسلمين بعز عزيز أو بذل ذليل وإن رغمت أنوف!

ولكن لما كان بعض إخواننا المجاهدين في الخارج ممن لم يطّلعوا على التفاصيل التي ترتبط بمواقف المشايخ الأخيرة ونحن أهل الأردن أخبر بها فإنهم قد يحسنون الظن بكلام المشايخ لسابقتهم – التي لا يُنكرها أحد – ومنعا لما قد يُتصوّر من أن أهل الأردن راضون بهذا المنحدر الذي انحدره المشايخ، وإعذاراً إلى الله تعالى بإنكار هذا المنكر وذباً عن عرض الدولة الإسلامية أعزها الله فإننا نؤكد على الأمور التالية:

أولاً: نبرؤ إلى الله تعالى من بيانات الشيخين المقدسي وأبي قتادة – غفر الله لهما – وما أصدروه في حق الدولة الإسلامية، ونعتقد أنها باطلة شرعا وواقعا، وعلى ذلك فهي لا تمثلنا ولا نرتضيها،و كل من وافق عليها وصرّح بتأييدها فإنه لا يمثّلنا ونبرؤ إلى الله من فعله.

ثانيا: ندعوا الشيخين إلى تقوى الله عز وجل والتجرّد من الهوى ونذكرهم بالموقف بين يدي الله ونعِظهم بأن الأعمال بخواتيمها وأن السابقة ليست بعاصمة من مضلات الأهواء والفتن وأن الرجوع إلى الحق خير من التمادي في الباطل وأن من كان ذيلاً في الحق خير ممن كان رأساً في الباطل.

ثالثاً: ندين الله تعالى بأن الدولة الإسلامية أعزها الله هم أحق الناس بوصف الطائفة المنصورة الظاهرة على الحق في هذا الزمان وأنهم أحق الناس بالنصرة والتأييد وأنه يجب على جميع المجاهدين لا سيّما في العراق والشام بيعتهم والنزول تحت رايتهم.

رابعا: ندعوا البقيّة الباقية من إخواننا الصادقين في جبهة الجولاني إلى المسارعة في التبرؤ من تلكم الجبهة وبيعة الدولة الإسلامية، ونخص بالدعوة إخواننا من أهل الأردن في درعا والغوطة فقد ظهر لكم عمالة حلفائكم وانحراف قادتكم وافتقادهم لأي مشروعٍ حقيقي تُحفظ به ثمرة جهادكم ودماء إخوانكم الشهداء، وأنه لا مشروع لهم ولا حديث عندهم إلا الطعن في دولة الخلافة، واسألوهم ما هي رؤيتكم وكيف ستقيمون الإمارة الإسلامية المزعومة التي تنشدونها؟ أهي بالتحالف مع المتردية والنطيحة من العملاء والمنحرفين كجبهة آل سلول وسائر الصحوات؟ فإنها حينئذ إمارة سلولية لا إمارة إسلامية! أم ستقيمونها وحدكم؟؟ فلقد حاربتم الدولة بحجة التفرّد و”الافتئات” على الأمة! أم ستستشيرون أهل الحل والعقد في الأمة؟ فأعطونا قوائمكم فعندنا أضعافها ولا تنسوا السرورية والمرجئة والإخوان فلا تفتئتوا عليهم فإنهم من الأمة وحاشاكم أن تكفروهم.. فلعله إذاً ينزل المسيح عليه السلام قبل أن يجتمع هؤلاء معكم على دولة إسلامية!! فاتقوا الله عز وجل فهذه الدولة قد أعلنت الخلافة وهو واجب عليها متعيّن وطالما تحقق مناطه فلا تكون الشورى فيه وإنما الشورى في اختيار الخليفة وقد استشارت الدولة من تيسر لها من أهل الحل والعقد من خيرة أهل الجهاد، ثم اسألوا أنفسكم.. أي الموقفين أرضى لربكم وأغيظ لعدوكم : أن تدعموا الدولة الإسلامية القائمة وتساندوا هذه الخلافة الناشئة وتنخرطوا فيها لتعمّروا الصرح وتسدوا الخلل وتصوّبوا الزلل أم تبقوا منتظرين للأمر المظنون والوهم المكنون في الأذهان؟؟ ونعيذكم بالله من الثالثة الحالقة وهي معاداة دولة الخلافة وقتالها.

خامسا: ولإننا نعلم أن ديدن الشيخين في الآونة الأخيرة – لا سيما الشيخ المقدسي-  هو حشر من يخالفهم في زمرة الغلاة، فإننا نتبرؤ من مسلك أهل الغلو في الأردن حتى وإن زعموا نصرة الدولة الإسلامية ونحن في هذا متسقين مع موقف الدولة أعزها الله في نبذها للغلو وأخذها على يد الغلاة حتى وإن كانوا من جنودها، وهو أمر يعلمه الشيخان جيدا عن الدولة ولكن الإنصاف عزيز!

سادساً: نؤكد أن هذا البيان يمثل الطائفة الأوسع من أبناء دعوة التوحيد والجهاد أو ما يعرف بـ”التيار السلفي الجهادي” في الأردن ويتبناه الفئة الأكبر من أعيانهم وطلبة العلم وأصحاب السابقة في ساحات الجهاد من أبناء هذه الدعوة المباركة، ولم يصدّر هذا البيان باسم أبناء دعوة التوحيد والجهاد إلا لإن الموافق والمخالف – بمن فيهم الشيخ المقدسي -  لَيعلم أن أنصار الدولة الإسلامية هم الثلّة الأكبر من أبناء هذا التيار في الأردن، ولا عبرة بمن قد يخرج من المشغّبين الذين صدّرهم الإعلام وتعوّدنا سماع التصريحات المشبوهة منهم،ولا بد أن ننوّه أنه كان من المفترض أن يوقّع على هذا البيان مجموعة كبيرة من أبناء هذا التيار بأسمائهم،إلا أنه منع من ذلك الحملة الأمنية الأخيرة على أنصار الدولة الإسلامية في الأردن واعتقال بعضهم وتهديد بعضهم الآخر خاصة بعد اعتراض الكثير منهم على موقف الشيخين المقدسي وأبي قتادة وكان من آخرها اعتقال الأخ محمد الزهيري (شاعر القاعدة) فك الله أسره، وكذلك الملاحقة الأمنية للإخوة الذين طلبوا الشيخ المقدسي للتحكيم ، والله المستعان .

سابعاً:  وفي هذا الخضم من الأحداث وتوالي البيانات والتصريحات المؤسفة سواء من الشيخين المقدسي وأبي قتادة أو من بعض الشخصيات المتصدرة في الإعلام والمتحدثة – تجنّياً- باسم أبناء دعوة التوحيد والجهاد، فقد خرجت رسائل من الشيخ الصابر أبي محمد الطحاوي – فك الله أسره – فيها مباركة بفتوحات العراق والتي أسماها الشيخ بـ”قادسية البغدادي”، وفيها كذلك مباركة ومؤازرة لإعلان الخلافة وبيعة الخليفة أبي بكر، وكذلك فيها تأييد لعملية قتل اليهود الثلاثة في مدينة الخليل، فنقول إن هذه الرسائل الطيبة للشيخ الطحاوي لتعبّر عن التوجه الأصيل لأبناء دعوة التوحيد والجهاد، بل هي لهَج أي مؤمن صادق، فإن فتوحات العراق لا يفرح بها ويعرف الفضل للقائمين بها إلا مؤمن صادق، ولا يكرهها أو يتنكر لمن قام بها إلا من في قلبه مرض، وكذا فإن إعلان الخلافة فيه البشرى للصادقين ولا يعارضه إلا الجاهل بحقيقة الأمر أو صاحب الهوى والحسد، فشكَر الله للشيخ الطحاوي هذا الموقف ونسأل الله أن يفيض عليه مزيدا من الصبر والثبات وأن يعجّل بفكاك أسره وأن يجزيه عنا خير الجزاء. 

ثامنا: ندعو إخواننا أبناء دعوة التوحيد وأنصار الجهاد إلى عدم الانشغال بالمرجفين وشبهاتهم والطاعنين وأهوائهم وحتى لو كان بداعي الرد، فإنه لم يعد عند القوم متعلق إلا الهوى وقد قامت الحجة عليهم ، وإنما ندعو الإخوة إلى الانشغال بنصرة دولة الخلافة، والترفّع عمّا لا يليق بأجناد هذا المشروع العظيم والذي يُعد أحد المفاصيل التاريخية في مسيرة شهادة الأمة الإسلامية على سائر الأمم.

وإنا نعلم أن البعض قد يلومنا بأنا قد تأخرنا، فنقول له والله لقد كان السكوت أحب إلينا إذ أن المشايخ في السجن وليس من شأننا المزاولات الإعلامية، ولكن بعد الفواقر التي أتى بها أبو قتادة من وصف “كلاب أهل النار” وكتابه “ثياب” الخليفة الذي كان كلامه فيه عارياً عن “حلية” العلم  و”لبوس” التقوى وكذا بعد خروج الشيخ المقدسي من السجن وتبيين الإخوة الحق له وإصراره وعناده على الطعن في الدولة الإسلامية رغم ما رآه بأم عينه من استغلال الإعلام الكافر لكلامه في حرب الخلافة، فإنه ما عاد يسعنا إلا البيان .. وإنما هذه هي “مسؤولية الكلمة” الحقيقية..

والله المستعان، وحسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل.

والحمد لله رب العالمين

رمضان 1435 هـ

____________

Source: http://justpaste.it/gblo

To inquire about a translation for this statement for a fee email: azelin@jihadology.net

New statement from Jabhat al-Nuṣrah: “About Deterring Ones Who Are Corrupt”

VH641

Click the following link for a safe PDF copy: Jabhat al-Nuṣrah — “About Deterring Ones Who Are Corrupt”

___________

Source: http://justpaste.it/gbni

To inquire about a translation for this statement for a fee email: azelin@jihadology.net

The Jihad Media Elite presents a new release from Jabhat al-Nuṣrah’s Dr. Sāmī al ‘Uraydī: “Illuminations #1″

E6n9JG

Click the following link for a safe PDF copy: Dr. Sāmī al ‘Uraydī — “Illuminations #1″

___________

Source: https://alfidaa.info/vb/showthread.php?t=101233

To inquire about a translation for this release for a fee email: azelin@jihadology.net

New video message from Himam News Agency: “Report 84: Jabhat al-Nuṣrah Maintaining the Dār Hospital To Treat the Patients – Rural Ḥamāh”

NOTE: For previous parts in this video series see: #83#82#81#80#79#78#77#76#75#74#73#72#71#70#69#68#67#66#65#64#63#62#61#60#59#58#57#56#55#54#53#52#51#50#49#48#47#46#45#44#43#42#41#40#39#38#37#36#35#34#33#32#31#30#29#28#27#26#25#24#23#22#21#20#19#18#17#16#15#14#13#12#11#10#9#8#7#6#5#4#3#2, and #1.

BrJQs1DIYAAEpy0

____________

Source: https://twitter.com/Hemm_Agency/status/482536847139426304

To inquire about a translation for this video message for a fee email: azelin@jihadology.net

Check out my new research paper for the Washington Institute: “The War Between ISIS and al-Qaeda for Supremacy of the Global Jihadist Movement”

Abstract:

The recent insurgency in Iraq has spawned fresh questions about what interests the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) represents and how exactly the organization relates to al-Qaeda. Indeed, although the groups have found tenuous common cause in military engagements such as Iraq, their relations have been characterized by distrust, open competition, and outright hostility. The final break came with ISIS’s recent expansion from Iraq into Syria, spurring al-Qaeda to disavow the group earlier this year. In the battle for global jihadist supremacy, ISIS now holds the upper hand, with al-Qaeda struggling just to fend off its own decline.

In this new Institute Research Note, Aaron Y. Zelin examines the history and evolution of relations between ISIS and al-Qaeda, detailing factors that could help or hinder each group in their battle for domination of the global Jihadi arena.

Click here to read the entire paper.

New statement from Jabhat al-Nuṣrah: “The Battle ‘Now We Invade Them’ For Control Of the Strategic Village of Umm Sharshūḥ In Rural Ḥomṣ”

VH641

Click the following link for a safe PDF copy: Jabhat al-Nuṣrah — “The Battle ‘Now We Invade Them’ For Control Of the Strategic Village of Umm Sharshūḥ In Rural Ḥomṣ”

__________

Source: http://justpaste.it/fug5

To inquire about a translation for this statement for a fee email: azelin@jihadology.net

New video message from Himam News Agency: “Report 83: Jabhat al-Nuṣrah Distributes Food Baskets To the Needy – Rural al-Ladhāqīyyah (Latakia)”

NOTE: For previous parts in this video series see: #82#81#80#79#78#77#76#75#74#73#72#71#70#69#68#67#66#65#64#63#62#61#60#59#58#57#56#55#54#53#52#51#50#49#48#47#46#45#44#43#42#41#40#39#38#37#36#35#34#33#32#31#30#29#28#27#26#25#24#23#22#21#20#19#18#17#16#15#14#13#12#11#10#9#8#7#6#5#4#3#2, and #1.

BpY_ahYCQAEB34I

__________

Source: https://twitter.com/Hemm_Agency/status/474636544267911169

To inquire about a translation for this video message for a fee email: azelin@jihadology.net

al-Baṣīrah Foundation for Media Production presents a new video message from Jabhat al-Nuṣrah’s Dr. Sāmī al ‘Uraydī: “Milestones in the Manhaj of the Pious Predecessors #4″

NOTE: For earlier parts in this video series see: #3, #2, and #1.

rfjcuy

__________

Source: http://justpaste.it/fqzm

To inquire about a translation for this video message for a fee email: azelin@jihadology.net

The Clear Banner: “The Clash Over ‘Real Jihad’ in Syria: ISIS vs. the Caucasus Emirate”

NOTE: For prior parts in the Clear Banner series you can view an archive of it all here.

The Clash Over ‘Real Jihad’ in Syria: ISIS vs. the Caucasus Emirate

Caucasus Emirate graffiti in #Latakia left by #Chechen fighters | #Syria

By Joanna Paraszczuk

The ongoing hostilities between the Islamic State of Iraq and a-Sham (ISIS) and Syrian brigades have exacerbated a pre-existing rift between rival North Caucasian factions in Syria, specifically Umar Shishani’s faction in ISIS and his former brigade Jaish al-Muhajireen wal-Ansar, which considers itself aligned to the Caucasus Emirate.

Essentially a struggle for prestige among North Caucasian jihadis in Syria and their supporters, the North Caucasian infighting has grown out of an ideological battle over which faction has the “correct” approach to jihad in general and the jihad “back home” in the North Caucasus in particular; how the jihad in Syria relates to the Caucasus Emirate’s struggle in the North Caucasus; and the circumstances under which North Caucasians may wage jihad in Syria instead of at home.

The ongoing debate has raised key questions not only about where North Caucasian jihadis’ loyalties should lie, but also about  the nature of jihad in the North Caucasus and its relationship to jihad in other parts of the world. Is the North Caucasian struggle primarily a local, ethno-national battle restricted to “lands ruled by the Russian kuffar” (in which case North Caucasians ought to stay at home and fight there)? Or is it just one small part of a wider, transnational movement focussed on establishing a global Caliphate, a struggle that knows no national boundaries?

These difficult questions have been addressed by North Caucasians in Syria, by the Caucasus Emirate leadership itself and by pro-Caucasus Emirate outlets like Kavkaz Center. Moreover, against the background of the ongoing hostilities between the Islamic State of Iraq and as-Sham and Syrian brigades, this debate has become an integral element of a growing ideological rift between North Caucasians loyal to ISIS and those loyal to the Caucasus Emirate.

ORIGINS OF CHECHEN FIGHTERS IN SYRIA

The exact number of Chechen jihadis in Syria  is unknown (and in any case numbers are fluid, as fighters are killed and new recruits enter Syria). Estimates have varied from around 200 to as many 1,700 fighters (the latter figure was given by the Russian Embassy in Damascus and is likely exaggerated).

Regardless of their numbers, these Chechen jihadis can be divided into four groups. The largest group are ethnic Chechens who had been living in Europe as migrants or refugees. The second-largest group is ethnic Chechens from Georgia’s Pankisi Gorge. Russian-language news site Kavkazskii Uzel estimates there are around 200 Pankisi Chechens in Syria, the most prominent of whom is ISIS military emir Umar Shishani. The third group are Chechens who came from Chechnya itself. Estimates of this group vary from 30-100 fighters and these include fighters from “Tarkhan’s jamaat”, the faction of Chechen commander Tarkhan Ismailovich Gaziyev, who split from Dokku Umarov in 2010.  The smallest group consists of veterans of the Russo-Chechen wars, the most well-known of whom is Muslim Abu Walid Shishani who fought with Emir Khattab in Chechnya from 1995. Abu Musa Shishani, of whom little is known, is a seasoned fighter and is also likely a Chechen war veteran.

THE CAUCASUS EMIRATE’S POSITION ON THE SYRIAN JIHAD

The Caucasus Emirate (CE),  officially declared on 31 October 2007 by a group of North Caucasian jihadis led by Dokku Umarov, has been described as a “transnational entity that extends beyond the Caucasus to encompass all Muslims oppressed by ‘Rusnya’” [i.e. Russia]. Umarov (whose death was announced on 18 March) expressed opposition to North Caucasian fighters traveling to Syria to wage jihad. In a November 2012 video address, Umarov accused those who had gone to Syria of undermining jihad at home, warning that these fighters were not waging jihad but simply trying to replace one taghut  for another:

There are people going there [to Syria] who are saying that there is no jihad in the Caucasus, that jihad in the Caucasus is over, and therefore they allegedly went to Syria. No, there is jihad in the Caucasus, and it is more brutal and more severe than in Syria. No one provides help or support for jihad in the Caucasus.

However, by summer 2013, just before the first splits began to appear in the Chechen ranks, it seemed the CE was – at least in part – reevaluating this view, with CE-linked publications like Kavkaz Center beginning to report positively on Chechen fighters in Syria. As one analyst has argued, this move was likely, at least in part, an attempt to assert authority over Chechen jihadis in Syria, who appeared to be gaining in power and prestige.

While the Caucasus Emirate hardly expressed its full support for North Caucasians going to Syria to wage jihad, via its media outlets it moved toward the admission that this was permissible, if only for those who were not in a  position to wage jihad back home. In other words, jihad in the North Caucasus should take priority over that in Syria, but the North Caucasian and Syrian jihads were part of the same global struggle of Islam against the kuffar.

Kavkaz Center hinted at this new position in July 2013 through a “letter to the editor” (purportedly) written by one Umm Sayfullah of Uruz Marten:

The issue I want to discuss is jihad in Syria and the Caucasus. And even though several articles and fatwas have been published on this matter, the situation has not been clarified. 

Jihad in Syria started after the jihad in the Caucasus, in Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, where the Holy Al-Quds has for several decades been occupied by the kuffar, but it’s the jihad in Syria that has become most popular among Russian-speaking followers of Islam, and even Caucasian Muslims, who are going to Syria in entire jamaats.

In connection with this, I want to raise the question — is it not a priority for Caucasian Muslims to wage jihad in the Caucasus? Allah is my witness, I’m not against brothers going to Sham. But isn’t fighting the kuffar in the Caucasus more important for Muslims from this area?

In Syria, as we know, Muslims are coming from all Arab countries, and also from Turkey, Pakistan, Southeast Asia, Europe, and America… So what about the Caucasus? It is right for Muslims to leave the fight at home and go to another area?

I understand that the jihad in Syria needs Mujahideen. We see how the kuffar, Shi’ites from all over the globe are joining in the war against Sham and this is a serious issue. But for Caucasians, in my view, the priority has to be jihad in their native home. After all, the hardest jihad is in the Caucasus today! …

I think that Emirs in the Caucasus and in Syria need to explain to people, that those Caucasian brothers who can join the jihad in the Caucasus must in the first instance try to go there. And in the event that there is no way for them to get there or if there is some major reason — then they can go elsewhere.

Those brothers from Syria, who ask for help, must absolutely explain that they are talking about those who cannot wage jihad for the Caucasus Emirate. And that for Caucasians, jihad at home is more important and the first priority over jihad in any other place.”

Two weeks later, on July 30, 2013, this message was further reinforced in a a video address — also published on Kavkaz Center — by a Chechen fighter named Salahuddin Shishani, at the time the commander of a group named az-Zubеyr. Salahuddin, who had been named the “official representative of the Caucasus Emirate in Syria” was therefore presumably also speaking in that faction’s name when he addressed “the Muslims of the Caucasus, Crimea, and other Muslim lands occupied by the Russian kuffar”. In other words, this is not an address intended for Muslims or Mujahideen in general, but for those under the ideological sway of the Caucasus Emirate.

In the video, Salahuddin – whose affiliation to the Caucasus Emirate further emphasized by his sartorial choice of an “Imarat Kavkaz” logoed t-shirt – repeats the message given in Umm Sayfulla’s letter, but goes beyond this by placing the issue of where North Caucasians should wage jihad in the context of a more global cause. It is understandable, he notes, that Muslims from countries where there is no jihad or where it is not possible to wage jihad should come to Syria. However, he cautions,  such a move is “not correct” for those in places where there is already jihad, such as Libya, Kashmir “or our Caucasus”. Notably, Salahuddin also refers clearly to Dokku Umarov’s authority by noting that the CE leader gave an explicit order for North Caucasians to wage jihad against the Sochi Olympics, an order which must take priority to the jihad in Syria, at least for those able to fulfill it.

SPLITS IN THE RANKS

Infighting among North Caucasian fighters in Syria began as early as August 2013. By summer 2013, many if not most Chechen fighters were part of the Jaish al-Muhajireen wal-Ansar brigade (JMA), commanded by a charismatic, ginger-bearded jihadi named Umar Shishani.

By August, however, there were already signs of tensions among North Caucasian jihadis.

One cause of the tensions was the decision by Umar Shishani to take on the role of ISIS military emir in northern Syria. Although at that stage he had not formally sworn allegiance to ISIS nor did he move for JMA to be absorbed into join ISIS, the predominantly North Caucasian faction was de facto fighting as part of ISIS, most notably in the battle for Menagh Airbase in Aleppo.

In August, Umar very publicly expelled a group of about 27 Chechens headed by Sayfullah Shishani, a charismatic and volatile ethnic Chechen who was formerly Umar’s close confidante and second-in-command. Umar accused his former ally of being a “takfiri”, but it later emerged that two men had disagreed over whether JMA should pledge allegiance to ISIS or not. Sayfullah was against the move, and wanted the Chechens to remain independent, while Umar supported it. Initially, Sayfullah and his faction joined forces with Muslim Shishani, and Abu Musa Shishani.

By November, there was another, more significant split in the North Caucasian ranks, when Umar and a group of his men from JMA decided to pledge allegiance to the Islamic State of Iraq and as-Sham and left JMA en masse. They left behind a group of Chechen jihadis who had already pledged allegiance to CE Emir Dokku Umarov, and who refused to renege on that pledge by swearing an oath to ISIS leader Baghdadi. The leadership of JMA was assumed by Salahuddin Shishani, who had been named the “official representative” of CE in Syria.

This move effectively ended Kavkaz Center’s support for Umar Shishani. The site, which had previously published reports and interviews with Umar that had originally appeared on Umar’s website FiSyria, stopped doing so.

Not all Chechen jihadis in Syria who chose not to pledge an oath of allegiance to Dokku Umarov joined ISIS, however. While Salahuddin Shishani and his faction in JMA remained loyal to the CE and Umarov, Sayfullah and two other prominent Chechen jihadis in Syria, Muslim Shishani and Abu Musa Shishani, announced in a video address in November that they believed that although they had pledged allegiance to Dokku Umarov, they should remain independent in Syria because Umarov did not hold sway over Syria; and neither did any other emir.

Although Sayfullah supported his comrades-in-arms Muslim and Abu Musa in their drive for independence, by December he had changed tack again. Likely because his group, Jaish ul-Khilafa, was relatively small and based in Aleppo (Muslim and Abu Musa fought mainly in Latakia Province), and because he liked to take part in well-publicized, large battles against regime targets, Sayfullah had begun to fight alongside Syrian Islamic faction Jabhat al-Nusra in Aleppo. Fired up by the success of that battle, he formally swore allegiance to Jabhat al-Nusra. However, Sayfullah — who had previously been involved in anti-Russian protests in Istanbul — remained ideologically committed to the North Caucasian struggle, making several videos in which he cursed and threatened Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov.

CLAIMING ALLEGIANCE TO THE CAUCASUS EMIRATE: UMAR’S ISIS FACTION

Having decided to join ISIS and pledge an oath to its leader, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Umar Shishani and his second-in-command Abu Jihad Shishani (although he uses the name “Shishani” (“Chechen”) sources say he is an ethnic Karachay) faced a dilemma. Either they had to admit that they had renounced the Caucasus Emirate, or they had to produce a convincing explanation as to why pledging allegiance to Baghadi did not mean they were completely breaking with Dokku Umarov and turning their backs on the North Caucasian jihad.

One indication of the pressing nature of this question is that Abu Jihad referred to it in an address to the Syrian people in January. Abu Jihad gave the address in Arabic in Umar’s name in January, in response to the outbreak of hostilities between ISIS and other factions.

Abu Jihad said that the only reason he and Umar chose to join ISIS and not Jabhat al-Nusra is because Baghdadi had agreed to help send Chechen fighters back to the North Caucasus to wage jihad. This condition, Abu Jihad claimed, was so important to Umar Shishani that he immediately agreed to join ISIS:

We went to their Emirs [i.e. of Syrian factions, he does not say which but Jabhat al-Nusra is implied] and were surprised to experience arrogance and complacency. We told them that we had a bit of business connected with the jihad in the Caucasus, and that the intention was to help, and that we were planning to send brothers back, home. 

We were surprised by the reply, when they told us that these conditions were unacceptable and that whoever joins them can’t set out conditions…. And then we found out about the proclamation of ISIS…We described [to Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi] the position in the Caucasus and said that we want to send brothers to help the Caucasus Emirate. His answer was pleasing, the Sheikh said that he had long been looking for ways to help the Caucasian brothers and he had finally found it. “It is our duty!” he said and praise Allah, from that moment we took an oath to Sheikh Baghdadi.

OTHER NORTH CAUCASIAN ISIS FIGHTERS’ POSITION ON JIHAD

Abu Jihad’s claim that Umar’s faction joined ISIS because it was the only way to help the Caucasus Emirate is not one that has been repeated by other ISIS fighters.

Instead, most Chechen ISIS fighters and thinkers have argued that, while the jihad in the North Caucasus is important, true mujahideen should avoid nationalism and separatism, since this is not true jihad. Instead, real mujahideen should unite under a single emir, regardless of their ethnic origin, and fight together to defeat the global kuffar and establish the global Caliphate. These jihadis have argued that the North Caucasian diaspora and its leaders call for Chechens to “wage jihad at home” as an excuse for not waging jihad at all, while JMA and those laying claim to be “the Caucasus Emirate in Syria” are hypocrites, because they do not practice what they preach and go home to the North Caucasus.

Abdullah Shishani, a Chechen ISIS fighter who regularly writes on ideological issues, expressed this worldview in a recent post on Russian social networking site VKontakte. First, Abdullah argues that there is no difference between waging jihad “at home” and elsewhere: for him, the concept of “Mujahideen” is wholly transnational rather than local or ethno-national — after all, there is only one global jihad and only one Ummah. Abdullah reinterprets Dokku Umarov’s November 2012 message, to mean that only those living in the North Caucasus should not go to Syria:

For those who say that as a first priority one should wage jihad at home in the Caucasus, and that it is not allowed to travel to other places where there is jihad…

We need to understand one thing – that the Mujahideen are those brothers who undertake the same activity on various territories. We have to help one another, keep in touch, and develop our fight against the Kuffar and traitors in all areas of jihad. 

1. Every believer agrees that we need to wage jihad where the Kuffar is closest to us. Caucasians LIVING in the Caucasus and Russia and those who went abroad but have the opportunity to go back should unite with the Mujahideen on that territory (Caucasus, Russia). But what about those who have no opportunity to go back to the Caucasus and those who aren’t helped to unite. At first, establish channels to go home and help brothers go back and then it will be possible to consider who and where is virtuous in the name of jihad.

2. In his speech, the Emir of the CE meant don’t go to Syria and generally that EXISTING mujahideen in the Caucasus not leave. And everyone agrees with that because at home the position is complicated and it’s not right for the mujahideen to leave that area of jihad and travel without permission from the Emirs.

3. Brothers, we must understand that it is not OK and not right to sit for years at home without waging jihad and not to fight the Kuffar and to say that we have to go home and that its not allowed to go elsewhere. Whether you’re starting to fret out of cowardice or whether Dunya has held you back so much and you’ve polluted yourself…Usually these themes are raised by those who are not in the Caucasus or in Syria either, but someplace in Turkey or Europe. They don’t go to fight the Kuffar and they are busy with some sort of “global affairs”.

4. We need to understand one thing, that this opinion and all these conversations, that you ought not to go to Syria, they’re coming from Emirs or from the usual blabbermouths and fanatics. Now the question arises. What is the whole Caucasus Emirate jamaat doing in Syria? The second question, why don’t they go home, if they’re needed at home. Third question, why are there thousands of brothers hanging around Turkey and Europe, who should be first in line to go home.

When you send them home, then let’s talk about the newbies who’re going to Syria and other mujahideen who want to wage jihad where they are able to travel. But you don’t do this. Then what’s the point in gathering people and leaving them at home. Start with yourselves.  Go home… 

5. How many ayahs and hadith are there on the theme of jihad. Our obligation is to strive on the path of Allah against the Kuffar wherever we can do that. And best of all, to create a good fundament on one land, to establish Sharia and work from there in all directions. But for that we have to unite under one imam and swear allegiance…the best example of this today is ISIS in Syria They are constantly busy with fighting and the ribats, liberating hundreds of kilometers from the kuffar and traitors… and why do they have victory after victory, when so many are against them? Because they are doing what Allah wanted, they are uniting in a big army and uniting for an Islamic State. 

“YOU’RE NOT EVEN REAL JIHADIS, ANYWAY” – ISIS ATTACKS KAVKAZ CENTER AND UMMAH NEWS

As the rift between Chechens in ISIS and JMA deepened, ISIS jihadis have begun to publicly attack pro-CE sites and social media accounts, including Kavkaz Center and Ummah News. This trend has increased in recent weeks, as JMA’s reputation and prestige as an elite fighting force in Aleppo has grown, while Umar Shishani and his faction appear increasingly marginalized.

In April, FiSyria, the website close to Umar Shishani and his North Caucasian faction within ISIS, published a scathing attack on Kavkaz Center, accusing the website of waging a deliberate disinformation campaign against ISIS. According to FiSyria, Kavkaz Center was promoting what it called “the Jaish al-Muhajireen wal-Ansar brand” at the expense of ISIS and “true” jihad.

FiSyria’s attack — a response to a report by Kavkaz Center that accused ISIS of attacking Syrian Islamic brigades and thus hindering them in their fight against pro-Assad’s forces — attempted to discredit Kavkaz Center’s position as the voice of the Caucasus jihad movement:

“As the face of the Caucasians they have disgraced themselves and many people laugh at them, calling them the Kav-Kav Center [the “Woof-Woof Center”]”, FiSyria wrote.

(The FiSyria website has since been taken offline so the original post is not available.)

Other ISIS-linked North Caucasians have taken these attacks further, accusing pro-CE outlets of promoting a narrow, nationalist (and hence anti-global jihad) agenda. They have claimed that pro-CE sites like Kavkaz Center and Ummah News do not represent real jihadis — and are perhaps even promoting US interests, as a recent post on the pro-ISIS website dowlah.wordpress.com suggests:

“Caucasian vinegratchiki [vinegrat is a Russian salad made from chopped beets. It is used as a slang term for a dismembered corpse created by a grenade or rocket explosion], if you got used to interfering with everything, if you can’t tell black from white, if you mistook Islam for a vinegrat, then someone has to deal with your ignorance. I don’t consider most of you followers of Islam, you’re more like adherents of the Caucasus, nationalists. Sites like “Chuma News” [“Plague News”, a play on words referring to Ummah News] and StorsjöCenter [i.e. Kavkaz Center, the reference is to Mikael Storsjö, the Finnish entrepreneur who hosted Kavkaz Center on his servers] had a chance to rethink their anti-Islamic and separatist activity regarding Islam, however they didn’t take that chance and just doubled their efforts to divide the Muslims into as many groups as possible, i.e. in essence they are carrying out the Pentagon’s propaganda work, most likely as volunteers…”

North Caucasians in ISIS have also tried to directly discredit JMA by claiming that jihadis from this faction have defected to ISIS because JMA was promoting the wrong sort of Islam.

“THEY DON’T EVEN FIGHT THE TAGHUT NUSAYRIS” – JMA’S RESPONSE

Though JMA and Sayfullah’s jamaat are officially neutral in the conflict between ISIS and Syrian factions, in recent weeks these groups have begun to openly criticize ISIS, accusing Umar and his men of harming local Syrians, and fighting other jihadis rather than the Assad regime. ISIS, they argue, thus goes against the ethos and practices of the “Caucasus Emirate in Syria” (JMA), and against those of Islam.

Abu Ubayda al-Madaniy, a North Caucasian scholar who is currently with Sayfullah’s jamaat writes this week that “Imarat [CE] are waging jihad exclusively against the kuffar, fulfilling their duty, ISIS are fighting against Muslims, calling them kuffar without basis. (They might have rare skirmishes with Assad’s soldiers once a month but mainly they fight Muslims)…The CE was announced by a shura  of Caucasus scholars and on the advice of the mujahideen, and the mujahideen give allegiance to the Emir of CE of their free will, unlike ISIS which forces everyone to accept their Emir…”

Another outspoken ISIS critic has been Abdul Karim Krymsky, an ethnic Crimean Tatar and Salahuddin Shishani’s second-in-command in JMA. In March, Krymsky gave an interview to pro-CE site Sham News, in which he strongly criticized ISIS for their behavior toward civilians in Aleppo. Krymsky argues that ISIS’s violence and brutality toward local populations is not Islamic and is therefore inconsistent with ISIS’s stated ideology and goal of wanting to create an Islamic State:

When they resorted to demonstrations of brutality against the population, it doesn’t smell like Islam at all. And such a policy for those who supposedly want to build an Islamic State, it looks really strange.

You can, of course, intimidate civilians. They lived for years under fear and oppression. But when these same several thousand armed men try to intimate tens of thousands of armed men, it looks very illogical not to say stupid.

Any unbiased view sees an enormous gulf between the words “Islamic State” and the violent crimes that they did. Again, it is impossible to discern any common sense, not to mention sincerity, in these acts. (the full interview is translated here)

RIFT SET TO DEEPEN

In the short-term at least, the rift between North Caucasian factions in Syria looks set to deepen still further, as the hostilities between ISIS and Syrian brigades continue and as JMA’s reputation as an effective fighting force is growing, while Umar Shishani’s faction becomes increasingly marginalized in the Syrian conflict and pushed out of the North Caucasian “jihadosphere”. It is likely therefore that at least while JMA’s star is on the rise in Syria, pro-ISIS North Caucasians will step up their attempts to denigrate that faction, including by arguing that its fighters are not true jihadis and are more interested in nationalism than establishing a global Caliphate.

Joanna Paraszczuk is a journalist with the Jerusalem Report magazine, covering the Syrian conflict, Israel, and the wider Middle East. She also monitors North Caucasian and Russian-speaking jihadis in Syria. You can find more of her work on her blog: chechensinsyria.com

New video message from Himam News Agency: “Report 82: Tour of the Jabhat al-Nuṣrah Hospital – Eastern al-Ghūtah – Damascus”

NOTE: For previous parts in this video series see: #81#80#79#78#77#76#75#74#73#72#71#70#69#68#67#66#65#64#63#62#61#60#59#58#57#56#55#54#53#52#51#50#49#48#47#46#45#44#43#42#41#40#39#38#37#36#35#34#33#32#31#30#29#28#27#26#25#24#23#22#21#20#19#18#17#16#15#14#13#12#11#10#9#8#7#6#5#4#3#2, and #1.

BpCnsrBIUAA-d3-

___________

Source: https://twitter.com/Hemm_Agency/status/473062350715887616

To inquire about a translation for this video message for a fee email: azelin@jihadology.net

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,862 other followers

%d bloggers like this: